Who will be the next bum to get exposed?

When did I put Pulev as P4P better than Floyd you dullard?

Floyd is an A* level fighter on part with Wlad. No question. You'll never catch me saying otherwise. He's an ATG.

Nowhere did I say Pulev is better than him. I said Pulev is an A level fighter, which he is. He's also better than Fury; you're deluded if you think otherwise considering Fury's poor motivation, shaky chin and dodgy defence.

 

I would agree to that but you're forgetting about the flag-waving, American tosspots who are determined to hate on any division not dominated by Americans. If an American isn't champ, it's a weak or boring division according to them.

Hence, WW will win even though it is the weakest division. Afterall, two fat, mulleted morons with food down their shirt who work at a video store on minimum wage can outvote a genius with a doctorate and a 6 figure salary (myself). Hence, why voting doesn't work.

But come on, you can't honestly say the heavyweight division is weak after the proof I've given you. It's a solid division but there is a gulf in class between Wlad and the rest and then, Pulev and the rest whereas as the other divisions are all more close and competitive between the top two guys and the others.

Wlad would school anyone in the division and Pulev would do the same to anyone not named Wlad Klitschko. Other than those two, the competitors are all around B and C level fighters to the fights are competitive, all the way along the top 2 - the top 25; there is a solid stream of competitors all around the same level with a few exceptions.

Take the boxrec #4, Fury... if he thought Eddie Chambers who is ranked I think in the late 20s, it would be a close fight. Too close to pick a definite winner.

Hence it is a SOLID division. The strongest in boxing because barring Wlad and Pulev, the competitors in the top 25 or so, are all very close skillwise with little between them. You can't say that about any other division in boxing.

 

Already done it with the heavyweight division if you read the thread.

I've also given my thoughts earlier as to WHY I think the heavyweight division is the best. Namely, depth of quality competition.

Barring a few bums like Hammer and Mitchell, there's very little separating boxers in the top ten (barring Wlad and Pulev) and boxers in the top 30.

Take Eddie Chambers (boxrec #28). If he fought boxrec #3 Tyson Fury, it would be a competitive fight with no clear winner.

Whereas Welterweight, there's a HUGE gap in talent from the top 5 and the top 30. Get out of the top 10 and you're talking about utter BUMS like Alvarado and Fernando Angulo. Hence it's a WEAK division. There's the top ten which for the most part, is reasonably solid (other than unproven bums like Brook and jokes like Khan) and then.....nothing. You enter bum territory.

Heavyweight, there's little between the guys ranked #3, 4, 5 etc and guys ranked #25, 26 etc. Hence, solid division. And those guys in the top 30 aren't bums like Alvarado and Angulo. The majority are solid boxers like Chambers, Charr and Chagaev.

 

What are you going on about you silly numpty?


Go back to watching wrestling, son. You obviously don't understand boxing. I think WWE is more your cup of tea, son.

 

Chris Eubank Jnr

Yes im sticking with this pick