Who will have the best career when it's all said and done between these prospects?

Holyfield had more children but is a genuine ATG fighter. yes his Heavyweight career is with him being full of steroids, but he's still a proven fighter.

is there not another forum that interests you? we have too many clueless people here already. :hi:

 

Calling Golovkin and Broner prospects is really a poor choice of description at this point.

Both have beat several top 20s making them no less than bonafide contenders. Both have won world titles in their perspective weight classes and both are already making or trying to make fights against the top dawgs in their divisions.

Wilder is by faaar the most untested "prospect" of the 4, but if he accomplishes what both Broner and GGG have already done, he will be considered a success story IMO.:thumbsup

 

People equate success with money and Broner will earn the most money for certain. He already has an entire media empire dedicated to his earning potential for whatever socially constructed criterion that is being forced down our throats through over marketing. What Broner does with his fame and financial gain in the long run is anyone's guess.

 

Broner and Golovkin aren't prospects.You could argue Thurman isn't one either.

Anyway I expect Broner to make a lot of money and some significnat legacy type matchups but fall short of his hype Iguess.

Golovkin is 31,he needs to do his business now nad I see he is.

 

troll patrol.