Who wins a prime freddie roach vs a prime roger mayweather

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PunchDrunk510, May 5, 2010.


  1. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    :good If Mayweather had a chin he might have been great.
     
  2. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,136
    10,553
    Jul 28, 2009
    I didn't say you said I did. :lol:
     
  3. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,136
    10,553
    Jul 28, 2009
    And some leg too.
     
  4. twopiece

    twopiece Pugilistic Ambassador Full Member

    5,613
    336
    Sep 28, 2007
    Prime for prime, Roger Mayweather wins by KO over Roach. No question.
     
  5. African Cobra

    African Cobra The Right Honourable Lord President of the Council banned Full Member

    27,342
    10,122
    May 29, 2007
    In addition Uncle Roger had serious 1 punch power.
     
  6. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    You ****in stupid?:huh Roger! He was a world champion and a very good fighter. Roach was too but he was limited....he didn't have the talent and tools that Roger had.
     
  7. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,014
    4
    Jul 30, 2008
    Yeah exactly.... I don't know how anyone can say Freddie wins a streetfight.:huh
     
  8. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    You don't need a huge punch to win a streetfight, you just have to land first. Freddy would have a chance on the street. He could take em better and was less inclined to pick his shots.
     
  9. ricardoparker93

    ricardoparker93 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,831
    11
    May 30, 2009
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxcYHe4Xj4I[/ame]

    Mayweather beats Roach.. but he was ALWAYS vulnerable.
     
  10. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,014
    4
    Jul 30, 2008
    You're reaching man.


    There is nothing about Freddie Roach that would indicate he is better suited to fight outside the ring than Roger. Nothing. Of course he would have a better shot because of the lack of rules, but Roger was a much much better fighter, and I would have to bet on him outside the ring also, especially without any specific information to the contrary.
     
  11. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    freddie was a punching bag...roger would knock him inside 4
     
  12. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Throws more punches, better chin. He has a much better chance with no gloves on than with. That doesn't mean I would put money on him in that fight.
     
  13. BOI GT

    BOI GT Active Member Full Member

    628
    0
    May 2, 2009
    Not to change the subject but Lockridge caught his ass good. Great Vid! Thanks for posting.
     
  14. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    Roger smashes Roach in p4p "Prime" fight.
     
  15. crimson

    crimson Boxing Addict banned

    5,899
    0
    Dec 8, 2009
    Roach had everything to be a great boxer - smarts, discipline, heart, - except for talent.

    Roger by KO 5 rounds or less.

    Anyway, passionate talentless athletes make the best coach and trainers.