Who wins: Adamek ~vs~ Cunningham

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Dec 9, 2008.


  1. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,541
    16,031
    Jul 19, 2004
  2. turbina

    turbina Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,783
    7
    Apr 17, 2008
    I like Adamek on points.

    He is faster, has a better chin, has better power, isnt afraid to get hit or exchange, but can also fight a very good techinical fight, which he himself has said he prefers. Likes to apply pressure and go forward. Good combinations, exciting and fun fighter to watch.

    Although it wouldnt surprise me if Adamek lands a nice shot or combo and finishes this one before the bell.
     
  3. RightCross

    RightCross Grandmaster of Boxing Full Member

    10,533
    3
    Aug 3, 2004
    He is not faster than Cunningham, USS has a slight handspeed advartage and the footspeed isnt even close. Adamaek is a plodder compared to USS.

    USS will keep hiom coming forward, turnign him and landing the combinations on his way to a comfortable decision
     
  4. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,541
    16,031
    Jul 19, 2004
    I tend to agree with this post.
     
  5. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,541
    16,031
    Jul 19, 2004
    Actually, I would argue that if anyone has a slight advantage in handspeed, it is Adamek!

    And although Cunningham has faster feet and better footwork, I reckon Adamek puts his combinations together more fluidly, too.
     
  6. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    :lol:

    Yeah Steve's feet move fast when he is back peddling(which he will do alot of).

    I also favor Steve in the clinch and run department.
     
  7. Monticello

    Monticello Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,012
    1
    Apr 2, 2008
    I'm going with Cunningham by decision.
     
  8. turbina

    turbina Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,783
    7
    Apr 17, 2008
    Cunningham is a slick fighter, this is true, but many people only have seen Adameks fights against Briggs, and Dawson, which give them a bad image of Adamek. But I do not think he is any quicker, especially in the handspeed department, also Adamek is no plodder.

    Adamek does not fight like he did in either of those fights normally. He likes a techinical fight, and is a smart fighter. He does like to mix it up if his opponent is willing to exchange, and he did so with Briggs, and beat a brawler in his own game. It is unlikely Cunningham will want to exchange with Adamek :)yep) so it will most likely be a pretty techinical fight.

    One big thing that Cunningham has over Adamek is reach.
     
  9. myau1

    myau1 Active Member Full Member

    553
    0
    Oct 11, 2008
    I'll say Adamek by mid fight KO. He's a powerful guy.
     
  10. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007
    You know Cunni will be watching the Dawson tapes. Whoever manages to assert their style will win. I'm still uncertain about Adamek's true power at this weight, especially against more durable comp. Both are proven to be capable of great fights and off nights. If both come in with their best stuff, we will have a FOTY candidate for sure. Prediction: The way all properly matched fights should be - too close to call.
     
  11. FlatNose

    FlatNose Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,800
    25
    Feb 16, 2006
    Adamek is way too easy to hit with right hands. Paul Briggs, who really isn't much , couldn't miss Tomaz . Cunningham is no knockout artist, but he'll pile up the points over the Pole's low left. USS by UD.
     
  12. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    I used to think Adamek, and I hope he does, but theres just something inside me that tells me Cunningham.
     
  13. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,541
    16,031
    Jul 19, 2004
    What was your original basis for thinking Adamek?
     
  14. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007

    It sounds like your entire opinion of Adamek is based on two old fights with thesame fighter. That is not sufficient to analyze any boxer. He got hit because he chose or was forced to brawl with Briggs and that's what happens when you have an all out brawl (see Marquez-Vazquez fights and the like). At least from those fights, we know he proved his chin against a very hard puncher. Aside from these early fights, he has shown an ability to be patient and box, without being hit excessively. In addition, since moving up to cruiser, his defense has become more refined and he is a lot harder to hit. In moving up in weight class, he has retained his speed, improved his defense and did not seem to lose any power. To be sure, I expect that he will be hit more in this fight than he was against Bell, but if Cunni is not slick enough to significantly reduce Adamek's usual output, it will likely be lights out for him.
     
  15. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005
    Cunningham close decision.