Who Wins at 160lbs? Julian Jackson or Tommy Hearns?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Florida boy, Oct 30, 2007.


Page 2 of 2
  1. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    hahaha fair enough. Work is very slow today so I think I am looking for something to keep me occupied.
     
    MSTR, Oct 30, 2007
    MSTR, Oct 30, 2007
    #16
  2. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    :huh

    Both Jackson and Hearns were better @ 154 than at 160.

    The drop-off isn't that large to strongly favor Jackson, if at all.

    Hell, at least Hearns wasn't half-blind for the majority of his time at 160.
     
    Thread Stealer, Oct 30, 2007
    Thread Stealer, Oct 30, 2007
    #17
  3. Florida boy

    Florida boy Bodacious Full Member

    1,078
    0
    Oct 3, 2007
    Because its peoples opinions, not YOUR opinion. You cant be sure because the fight never happened.
     
    Florida boy, Oct 30, 2007
    Florida boy, Oct 30, 2007
    #18
  4. Bigcat

    Bigcat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,545
    98
    Jan 10, 2006
    Its hard to give a reply on this one its a ko win either way.. ifthey fought 5 times 3 woukd be Ko by Hearns, 2 would be Ko by Jackson........
     
    Bigcat, Oct 30, 2007
    Bigcat, Oct 30, 2007
    #19
Page 2 of 2