Who wins: Cotto Vs Margarito-fighting-legal

We will never know if Margaritos wraps were amplyfied during his bout with Cotto. However, I think it would be the same outcome. The only way Cotto can beat Margarito is if he improves his stamina, or clinches more.

 

They already fought legal and Margarito made Cotto quit. Nevada cleared Margarito of any illegal doing

 

What was Illegal about their first fight ? ... were Cotto lost !

 

i think cotto learned form his loss to margo and the second time around would be different. i can see cotto taking a decision in a rematch. i for some reason also think the first cotto fight and now the SSM fight took a lot out of margo, and i do not rule out a tko in a rematch either!

 

Margie hasn't been cleared of anything in Las Vegas....there hasn't been any official inquiries.....

If they fought on a level playing field.....Margie would look like a rank amateaur and get his ass knocked out this time ....starting with body shots.

 

Okay thats why Nevada said Margarito was cleared for that fight.

 

What official said that????

You need to stop sucking on Margie's two inch burrito and see more clearly.

 

he was cleared
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/mma/boxing/01/27/margarito/index.html

 

Margarito would destroy Cotto again

 

maybe the report was fabricated though, maybe a cover up. Cotto was drugged before the fight thats why he was fading in the later rounds, much like wladimir was against brewster. I also heard from credible sources that margarito had a cement mixer in his locker room for that fight.

 

Margarito also injected roids into his chin and Cotto was wearing the wrong socks.

 

I read the article....simply states that there is no current investigation...
and that as far as he knows he is certain nothing illegal occurred....also,
that he believes that the CSAC will come up with a misunderstanding.

I thought you had something more plausible.....
What are you and Bazooka taking turns on Margie's two inch burrito?

 

You're criticising him for not having something more plausible? All you have is speculation without a shred of evidence.

 

and what the **** did you expect? the fight happened in july of last year, if they found anything illegal we would've know then. they'll start an investigation based on what? what evidence do they have?