Who Wins? Kell Brook or Mike Jones?

Kell who?

 

yesss!!!!!!!!!

 

"I could beat Michael whilst singing the national anthem, balancing a mug of tea on my head and holding in a poo".

Kell Brook on a potential fight with Michael Jones

 

Please tell me which of these were demolished, and explain how.


Not including Witter because he was shot to bits, but even then he wasn't 'demolished'.

 

Hatton, Hatton, Rhodes, and on....

 

Since when was Matthew bloody Hatton meant to do anything. He was average at domestic level in many peoples eyes. Rhodes was just old.

Ricky Hatton fought the p4p no. 1's at the time.

You are still failing to give evidence to your claim of all these European fighters that have been 'demolished'.

:tired

 

Yeah bruh, Mike has more power than Khan

 

Who has less power than Brook...

 

Brook would stand there and let Jones throw his 100 punch combo he used against Karass, with his hands down. Brook would show his granite chin, then knock Jones out with one straight right. :deal

 

Uh idk :think I think Brook is just a hell of a lot more accurate with his punches than Mike

 

Khan's power is amazingly overrated. Jones doesn't plant his feet and even if he has some natural power, the fact he doesn't use it to its full potential is what matters.

As far as I'm concerned, even if Brook has less natural power, he shots are more damaging and will result in a quicker or bigger knockout because of accuracy compared to Jones.

 

you right about all of them. I wish Mike would fix that ****

 

Neither fighter rates to be honest, but of the two I'll go with Jones.

 

I'm surprised how 1 sided the poll is.

Jones is a good fighter, does he not have many fans in the US?

 

Hamed, Khan and Ricky Hatton all won and defended world titles in North America. Of the fighters you've mentioned only Hatton was demolished, and that at the very end of his career.