It true...you musta started watching boxing in 2010 Naz was making 5,6 million a fight....Floyd vs. Chico...1.5 million. Don't remembered the "Slave Wages" comment :hey Look that **** up.. Casual sport fans knew of Naz back then. Nobody outside of hardcores knew Floyd.
Mayweather on his worst day puts Hamed on his ass about 6-7 times, on his way to a landslide decision, possibly even a mid-to-late round stoppage.
Naz was entertaining, but there was nothing in his repertoire to suggest that he would stand any chance against Floyd. If you want to match up Floyd with fighters of the past, why don't you put him in with someone good? Barrera for example.
Naz himself stated the Floyd would likely go down as the greatest fighter that ever lived. The fact that he can make that statement tells you were he sees Floyd in comparison to himself.
He fought at featherweight because he was addicted to junk food and couldn't be bothered doing any roadwork. Naz probably should have fought at 122, but it should be noted that his legs were huge for a lighter-weight fighter, often giving the impression that he was smaller than he actually was as his weight was distributed differently from most of the people he fought. As well as being a better fighter, style-wise Floyd was a nightmare for Naz.