no it isn't. and you're a **** wit for thinking so. Context is everything. e.g if a fight is 50/50 and both guys are going for it, then a cut can stops the fight. Does it mean the other guy is better? no it doesn't. think about it, at least for a split second.
I'll tell you what is conclusive; Vitali pulling out of a fight with Rahman 5 times, then retiring for 4 years. :hi:
One of many legitimate and decisive ways to get a stoppage inflict MULTIPLE vicious cuts and require over sixty stitches to fix. So conclusive that his corner applied butterfly stitching prior to the calling. Automatic DQ under boxing - no medical dressings are allowed to be applied to bout whilst in progress. Watch the corner work. If Vitali had come away from one of his Muay Thai fights with over sixty stitches and suggested he had won he would be laughed at. :deal
seven people need to understand , the worst of Lewis , which was worse than the guy knocked out by Rahman sliced up a very close to prime Vtali. This wasnt a cut that was massive right away , so its Vtali's own fault in not protecting the damage. End of story.
That has got to be a cut and paste for Cobbler? ATG skin - who trains that? The Ponds Institute perhaps?
This is getting ridiculous. Vitali lost to a past-prime Lewis and would lose to a prime Lewis - simple as that. Move the **** on with your life.
The famous Bretchko who thinks Sugar Ray Robinson was a Heavy Weight :rofl:roflatsch. But in response to your post the rematch is irrelevant to the question asked as in a rematch of the one Vitali lost, Lennox still wouldn't have been in his prime would he? :roll: