Pros score controversial Georges St-Pierre vs. Johny Hendricks decision http://www.mmafighting.com/2013/11/...core-controversial-georges-st-pierre-vs-johny
Get the F out of here with that crap. Hendricks is an idiot and got beat 3-2 vs. GSP and should have lost to Lawler 3-2 also. Lawler beat the snot out of him for most of that fight. Hendrick is a little midget with a big mouth.
I saw it live and without any commentary... I thought GSP won I also thought Hendrix lost to Lawler, but I guess that was closer Anyway, Hendrix is still a 1 trick pony. Take away his left hand, he's useless until he takes u down
exactly , notice how in all of that writing the op didnt address the submission in round 1 ? the fight should have been over then . i think the op is sick a troll .
I honestly have to laugh at this whole situation, judging by people's reactions you would think that this was on the level of Whitaker vs. Chavez. It was a really close fight, logically how can this be a robbery? Hendrick's fight with Condit was equally as close so should we classify that as a robbery too? I think it's just that so many people wanted Hendricks to dethrone the champ, and when he didn't, they just couldn't handle it. Georges St. Pierre won the fight 3-2. It was close, like the Shield's fight, but going into the 5th GSP just wanted it more. Johnny Hendricks landed more power punches but GSP had the more effective striking. Hendricks has only himself to blame for losing that fight. It takes more to win a round than making your opponents face red.