As far as I could see all rounds but rd 1 consisted of Calzaghe standing at centre ring looking amourously at his opponent and occasionally being embraced by him, and otherwise waving at him in a way that resembled a crossover between a a punch and an attempt to swat a fly. 116-111 Calzaghe if not 117-110 (I dont even know if I want to score rd 1 10-8)
close, close fight... a point or two either way is fair. Personally I thought Calzaghe just nicked it
Mods please delete this thread is an abomination to the sweet science and an insult to the comminity's collective intelligence. OBVIOUSLY Calzaghe won and won by a long margin, the fact that it was a split decision is a disgrace. Here's my card: This content is protected
HOpkins Won.... Hopkins is the truth, calzaghe looked like **** in there:blood calzaghe had nothing to give except shitty slaps and aggression.. hopkins might not have won the decision but he proved hes the better fighter. He made him look like an amateur, Hopkins cant be dominated by a slapper... joes got This content is protected movement, come forward and smother.... Hopkins was having an easy time in there, 5 years younger and he would have stopped him Hopkins exposed the twat, i knew some1 with movement like hopkins would do that to joe, wait till roy jones, he will controll joe even at his old age
I don't need to argue with this besides to say that it is not true. Bernard clearly won more than one round.
I can genuinely remember you noting that several of my posts were good in the past. I can't remember the subject, but I definetly know you praised me a bunch of times on something. Don't let these posts confuse things, mate. Even I know I'm talking a load of **** here.
You are joking right,all the old man done was hold all night,calzaghe was trying to fight,which is why he got the decision. All credit to him though,it was VERY close:happy