Who won the fight? Jacobs or Rosado?

I can't give a definitive answer because the fight was boring and I looked away a few times. But I watched the majority of it closely and I saw Rosado doing better most of the time.

 

It didn't seem like Jacobs was trying hard enough. I had it for Rosado too.

 

Thanks for the update.

Use of the word many implies that the majority did. In comparison to the amount of people who didn't score it for Jacobs, not many scored it for him.

Is this in the reality with the frozen over hell or the one where you're universally disliked?

Imagine religiously defending Canelo and accusing someone else of A-side privilege! Brilliant.

It shows he's clearly not as good as an older GGG.

No, it shows that a prime Jacobs is on a similar level to a 37 year old GGG. And I'm sure you're selectively ignoring this, but after the Derevyanchenko fight, many were calling him shot, washed up and outright not elite.

If I'm sensitive about GGG, what are you about Canelo? Entangled? And it's brilliant that you think I'm annoyed with GGG getting critiqued. I'm sure @BCS8 will let you know about that

Also, that is an awfully specific analogy...

I wouldn't. If it were true. But yes, I happen to consider making things up and mentioning them when they're completely irrelevant to the thread as a bag.

 

man·y
/ˈmenē/

determiner · adjective
determiner: many; pronoun: many; adjective: many; comparative adjective: more; superlative adjective: most

1. a large number of.

most
/mōst/

determiner
determiner: most

1. greatest in amount, quantity, or degree.

I think you're getting your words mixed up. You know, English is my second language, I shouldn't have to be giving you English lessons.

I don't think I have ever denied A side fighters getting A side privileges. Its boxing, its been the norm in boxing for decades. Also, I don't defend Canelo, I don't need to. What I do is expose double standards used by his haters.

GGG was the clear benefactor of A side privileges in the Jacobs and Derevyanchenko fights, not sure why you're arguing against that? Its okay bro, GGG will be okay, and his legacy is what it is, we can speak truths.

Say what?! Look man, because Golovkin wasted so much of his prime fighting bums we can only use his fights against top fighters to rate him. Every time he has stepped up he has failed to impress. Put it this way, his best performance is getting a draw against Canelo making his debut at the full MW limit. lol

We can say prime G this, and younger G that, but the reality stands that a younger GGG was fighting complete nobodies and a bunch of Jr MWs so all we know is that a younger GGG could definitely crush helpless opponents... no different today.

I do agree though, that by the eye test and his performances against Jacobs, Canelo, and Chenko, he deserves to be classified as Elite. There is no doubt he is on par with Jacobs and Chenko, but there is also no doubt Canelo is the more accomplished, more daring, and better skilled fighter, no doubt.

With that said, I go back to my original point, If GGG is an elite fighter, so is Jacobs. Jacobs had an off night last night, or he just doesn't care for boxing, but when he was at MW he was undoubtedly top three for a long enough time to be called elite.

After many GGG fans were proven absolutely wrong after the first Canelo fight, where the prediction was GGG by KO or domination, that's when the whole GGG is shot or past his prime picked up a lot of steam. They just couldn't accept that Canelo making his MW limit debut would have caused GGG so many problems.

I don't care if anyone criticizes Canelo... He's been the most hated and criticized fighter since Mayweather, you think I'm sensitive? lol Like I told you, I just call out and expose double standards because I like to see his haters cry. Oh, but the first second anyone dares criticize GGG, OMG!! His fans would have you believe he has reached Canonization. lol

It might be an awful analogy, but the way some of you guys revere GGG, you'd think he's the last prophet or God himself. Hahaha

So we come full circle. You consider someone saying that Jacobs and Derevyanchenko are on GGG's level, or that they both arguably beat GGG a "bag"...? Slow down on the dick sucking bro.

 

You are trying to explain things to iSalty using logic and reason. This is folly. Like searching for the darkness using a torch.

On a side note do you feel Jacobs achieved all he could with what he had or did he miss out on more due to the Pirog loss? I always expected him to accomplish more than he has.

 

Even DAZNs Twitter account dunked in the fight. No winners. Gabe is a 34yr old who seems to be 40+ in ring years and Danny has no passion.

Terrible fight

 

I didn't score that **** but Rosado and I loathe to say that as he's one of my least favorite fighters and I am exhausted seeing him recycled continually on a world level. He won and Danny looked like ****,

 

lol, yeah, I was hoping that Jacobs would show me something different.

 

@IsaL Stung by the Young Gun slinger AKA-George.

 

Hahha.. you wish! That was a weak rebuttal and I finished dismantling him in my own rebuttal after that.

He took a knee when he read it and has since just peeked in, to see what others are saying and accept your encouragement and support. LMAO!!

 

Well “Many “ if not “Most “ agree with him

 

And that is how he lost this argument. His argument started with him accusing me of using many as most, but I clearly explained that most dont use most as many.

At any rate, Daniel Jacobs was or is an elite fighter. That's the point.

 

Anyone who scored it for Jacobs has to post their scorecards.
So that we can rip them to shreds.

There is no way Jacobs won 7 rounds.

 

Agreed! a draw would have been appropriate as neither one did enough to deserve to win