Who won the following fights?

DLH v Whitaker - too hard to score, very close, no robbery either way.
DLH v Quartey - didnt score it but did watch it, same as above, even fight, no robbery.
DLH v Trinidad - DLH won a close but clear decision to me.
DLH v Sturm - Sturm won clear enough.
DLH v Mosely II - DLH won clear.

 

I had DLH-Whitaker even. Quartey beats DLH, DLH beats Tito, Sturm beats DLH, DLH beats Balco Mosley in the rematch.

 

socrates thinks that ODH won against Sturm? :think

 

I also felt thats what cost him but also felt that was cancelled out by how ponderous & clumsey DLH was made to look at times, ring generalship & defence went in Pernell`s favour & clean punching & effective aggression was something that neither man had any advantage in.
That might sound like Im saying Whitaker won but Im not because on a rd by rd basis there was nothing in it, Oscar didnt land anything meaningfull & Pernell just plain never attacked enough.

 

Quartey, Tito and Sturm were clear losses. Whitaker and Mosley were tight.

 

De La Hoya/Whitaker - De La Hoya
De La Hoya/Quartey - De La Hoya
De La Hoya/Trinidad - Trinidad
De La Hoya/Sturm - De La Hoya (Beleve it or not I did have Oscar winning)
De La Hoya/Mosely II - De La Hoya.

 

Due to Pea giving away the last round, I scored that fight even.
I had Quartey beating Oscar by a point.
I managed to score the Trinidad fight for Tito - although since he's my favourite fighter, you might want to take that with a pinch of salt.
I thought Sturm clearly won.
Oscar-Shane had some hard rounds to score. Last time I watched it, I had Oscar winning 116-114.

 

i scored them all for Oscar except the Sturm fight

 

I agree.
Tho the poll is a bit confusing in the Mosley Vs. De La Hoya by not putting a little "II" by it.

 

De La Hoya/Whitaker-Whitaker
De La Hoya/Quartey - Quartey
De La Hoya/Trinidad - De La Hoya
De La Hoya/Sturm - Sturm
De La Hoya/Mosely II - Mosley

 

De La Hoya won them all in my opinion.