pretty much what everyone else saw, what each individuals make up allows them to admit is a whole other matter.
90 percent thought Canelo lost the first fight, the second fight 70 percent thought Canelo lost, so I give Canelo credit for doing better the second time.
i would say 75% of all people dksab, of course some of those clueless also went with canelo, but 67%(actual number) is hardly everybody. when your argument has to rely on such hyperbole, whats the point of even taking you seriously? ggg lost, it hurt your heart to see it, and now youre stuck with inflating facts in order to deal with the heartbreak.
115-113 Canelo although I could very, very easily see a draw or even a flipped score. GGG gave away rounds 1-3 and I thought he clearly lost 12. In between there, he won plenty of rounds but Canelo won at least 2 to give him a draw, probably 3 to get the win. Some really, really close rounds in there.
Everybody has certain biases. Just because the majority of people see something one way it doesn't mean they're right or unbiased. You guys sound weak overtime you try to add weight to your opinion by pointing out that others agreed with you.
Media almost 100% scored it for GGG ,but yea I guess they all know sheet about boxing. And all those trainers and boxers that scored it for GGG know nothing , it’s just you and a few other clows “understand” boxing. You also knew canelo was not juicing , it was that mexican beef . Talk to me about bias hahhaa
this is what i mean, you just talk out your ass to try and convince YOURSELF. to you, none of the boxers, trainers and fans who saw canelo win, exist. ill talk to you about bias. i thought ggg won the first fight and said so, i think canelo was on peds and said so, i attacked isal, shadow111, jm22 among others for defending canelo. if anything i just wrote is a lie, someone step up and defend this noob who seems to just talk out his ass. now you talk to me about bias.