Who won Thurman-Porter?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Bad Boy Bill, Jun 25, 2016.


  1. Bad Boy Bill

    Bad Boy Bill Active Member Full Member

    1,467
    82
    May 13, 2016
    Let's see what you think ESB
     
  2. Oxygene2

    Oxygene2 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,042
    95
    May 16, 2006
    Should have added a poll, I guess.

    Ah, there it is, and I shall vote: Thurman (115).
     
  3. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,364
    240,880
    Nov 23, 2013
    Porter 116-112 you b******
     
  4. Bad Boy Bill

    Bad Boy Bill Active Member Full Member

    1,467
    82
    May 13, 2016
    What's with the hostility? I put 116-112 in the poll.
     
  5. moparfan

    moparfan ESB's glass jawed fraud Full Member

    21,942
    2,042
    Jul 13, 2012
    Anything from 116-112 (either combatant) to 114-114 is viable...!!! Many close rounds could have gone to either boxer...!!!
     
  6. devon2

    devon2 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    105
    Jun 30, 2013
    Had it a draw. There were a lot of close rounds where it was basically overall output of shots vs cleaner shots. Sometimes the cleaner shots from Thurman made up for the work-rate of Porter, sometimes it didn't.
     
  7. Bad Boy Bill

    Bad Boy Bill Active Member Full Member

    1,467
    82
    May 13, 2016
    Hey, Rumsfeld is your name, not knowing **** about boxing is your game!:smoke
     
  8. Willie Maeket

    Willie Maeket "40 Acres and Mule" -General William T. Sherman Full Member

    13,894
    8,368
    Jun 22, 2015
    Porter had the higher work rate, Thurman shots were harder and cleaner.

    Thurman edged it but not by much.
     
  9. Bad Boy Bill

    Bad Boy Bill Active Member Full Member

    1,467
    82
    May 13, 2016
  10. KnightAndDay

    KnightAndDay Active Member Full Member

    616
    49
    Mar 5, 2016
  11. Bad Boy Bill

    Bad Boy Bill Active Member Full Member

    1,467
    82
    May 13, 2016
    Awesome!
     
  12. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,541
    16,033
    Jul 19, 2004
    :lol:
     
  13. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,364
    240,880
    Nov 23, 2013
    :think
     
  14. moparfan

    moparfan ESB's glass jawed fraud Full Member

    21,942
    2,042
    Jul 13, 2012
    The real winners tonight were the fans of boxing and boxing in general...!!!
     
  15. Villain

    Villain Active Member Full Member

    1,342
    128
    Jul 27, 2004
    I'll cut the fans at the arena a little slack because you see aggression easier from a distance than what is actually landing clean. But watching this on TV it was a competitive but clear win for Thurman. Perfect example of effective aggression vs not effective. When you are eating the harder cleaner counters coming in, that is not effective aggression. This was the case more rounds than not. Hell of a fight and much respect to both men however.