Who won?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Scissors, Jun 16, 2019.


Who won

  1. Kid Galahad

    51 vote(s)
    53.1%
  2. Josh Warrington

    45 vote(s)
    46.9%
  1. Suspect.chin

    Suspect.chin Active Member Full Member

    619
    306
    Dec 3, 2017
    Warrington won it. Barry didnt throw enough punches
     
  2. notjustacasual

    notjustacasual Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,619
    1,911
    Jun 3, 2019
    Or that Warrington belongs at Galahads level

    Beating a shot old husk of Frampton got taken out of context, people were calling Warrington elite
     
    Scissors likes this.
  3. ryuken87

    ryuken87 Active Member Full Member

    1,468
    877
    Mar 8, 2014
    I didn't score it RBR but my gut was that Galahad won.
     
    Accurate likes this.
  4. notjustacasual

    notjustacasual Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,619
    1,911
    Jun 3, 2019
    Frampton is shot to bits.
     
    ashishwarrior and CutThroatFade like this.
  5. Degale

    Degale Active Member Full Member

    704
    808
    Nov 24, 2013
    Galahad with a few rounds.

    Does anyone honestly think Warrington won 6 or 7 rounds?
     
    Accurate and Scissors like this.
  6. Trafford

    Trafford Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    2,835
    Sep 29, 2018
    Had Galahad winning by 2 rounds.
     
  7. Scissors

    Scissors Posts are sponsored by Matchroom Full Member

    9,364
    14,007
    Feb 11, 2018
    There’s **** all in it when you look at the punch stats. Warrington landed a punch more each round. So I’m not buying “KG forgot that to win you need to throw punches”.

    It was a robbery.
     
  8. Twentyman

    Twentyman You dog nonce! banned Full Member

    7,197
    14,789
    Apr 20, 2016
    Have you got a link for the punch stats mate?
     
  9. Scissors

    Scissors Posts are sponsored by Matchroom Full Member

    9,364
    14,007
    Feb 11, 2018
    16 more punches landed by Warrington but Barry being slightly more efficient and landing a bit more (%).

     
    stittyb and Twentyman like this.
  10. NasalSpray

    NasalSpray Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,565
    3,364
    Oct 22, 2018
    How is it a robbery if Warrington landed more punches?
     
    im sparticus likes this.
  11. dryzer

    dryzer Active Member Full Member

    749
    642
    Sep 12, 2017
    i had money on galahad but cant really cry robbery.
    dont think either could have complained about losing but as galahad stunk the gaff out with his tactics he deserved to lose it more.
     
    stittyb and BigStiffIdiot like this.
  12. Scissors

    Scissors Posts are sponsored by Matchroom Full Member

    9,364
    14,007
    Feb 11, 2018
    1 punch more a round he landed.

    Effective aggression - I think KG won in that department.

    Ring generalship - again I think he edged that.

    Defence - KG was making Warrington look daft and missing for fun. Look at how many punches didn’t land.

    Hard and clean punches - this is the hard one because it was such a dire fight. I don’t think anyone edged this.

    That’s how you score a fight. Feel free to give your explanation for each category.
     
  13. Twentyman

    Twentyman You dog nonce! banned Full Member

    7,197
    14,789
    Apr 20, 2016
    It’s not just scored on punches landed mate.

    Edit: just seen Scissors’ post.
     
  14. Dragon Punch

    Dragon Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,909
    3,431
    Sep 15, 2012
    I couldn’t give the fight to Galahad as he did far to much holding (I think he should have been deducted a point) and there was not nearly enough offence. His ring generalship was very effective thought.

    I also think that Warrington was starting to get to him towards the end and hurt him a few times to the body, which didn’t really get picked up on.

    I had the fight 115-113 to Warrington - terrible fight which I’m glad we will never see again.

    Let’s have Warrington v Valdez next.

    Eddie should put Galahad V Quigg on in the UK towards the end of the year as both are in a similar position now.
     
    lencoreastside likes this.
  15. NasalSpray

    NasalSpray Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,565
    3,364
    Oct 22, 2018
    There was very little to seperate either fighter in any category. Thats why this isnt a robbery, its a close fight.

    A robbery would be a fight where the overwhelming majority scored it one way and the judges went the other way, e.g. Taylor vs Peersons

    I've seen as many people score it for Warrington as Galahad in the media so how would it be classed a robbery?
     
    im sparticus likes this.