Who would have a better chance against Duran at 147: Spence, Crawford, or Ennis.

3 of the 4 you named haven't fought anyone, Only Shakur looks the real deal so far out of those 4. Did you name drop Ennis twice on purpose?

 

Haney beat Linares and jo jo
Tank beat barrios pedraza LSC and Gamboa
Ennis beat Lipinets but has the weakest resume of the bunch but will be fighting in an eliminator to face the winner of Spence-Ugas.

 

A far better question is does any of them go the distance not can they win. Ennis has some eye appeal but he's sooooo unproven and it's madness to suggest he'd beat a top 5 pound for pound all time great.

 

Surely the Custio Clayton fight isn't the eliminator?

 

Exactly what i said, they havent fought anyone. the 2 best names there are Linares and Leo..... and remind me, how many divisions was Leo dragged up?

 

Lol

 

They have fought named fighters some of which people here picked them to lose against.

 

It is

 

Duran was far more skilled than Spence but a lot smaller, Ennis is too green, Bud is the only one that might have beat Duran.

 

The same? Have youy lost your mind?

 

I was being hyperbolic Mark....please keep up.

 

Duran is one of the greatest of all time. No way any of these three can be considered in the same realm as Roberto.

 

It's not racism doofus, Ennis, Spence, and Crawford are not beating Duran and they are not on the level of Leonard

 

You calling another poster bad but you think you aren't bad?

George Foreman beat Hall of Famers Joe Frazier and Ken Norton and then lost to Jimmy Young a much worse fighter. So because Duran beat so called "legendary" fighters doesn't mean he wouldn't lose to Spence, Ennis, or Crawford.

We don't really know how good Ennis is until he steps up in class. Spence and Crawford could also beat Duran. Clearly Duran wasn't unbeatable which is why Tommy Hearns smashed him. Not saying Ennis, Crawford, or Spence could bang like Hearns.