Who would have a better chance against Duran at 147: Spence, Crawford, or Ennis.

Get your eyes checked then.

 

That was a step too far for trolling....I knew you were worthless which is why I call you out for nonsense threads.

 

Ennis won't be countering him. He'll be on his back after taking too many rights, or he'll be getting out-boxed because he runs away. Hearns out-boxed Sugar Ray Leonard for God sake.

Spence fights nothing like Duran. And even if he did, that'd bode extremely well for Tommy.

 

Crawford has a good chance tbf but if Duran is motivated then bud is losing an 8 - 4/ 9 - 3 kinda fight over 12.

Duran wrecks Spence. Stops him around the 8th. Duran is all wrong for Spence.

Maybe doesn't say much about me but I had to google who Ennis was until I remembered him. Tad early I'd say to have him in this conversation. Crawl before you can walk as they say.

 

What happens what what ?

This content is protected

 

Here we nostalgia crowd once again god forbid current era fighter could beat a forum 80-90s darling not like fighters are bigger and more conditioned and just genetically superior than past fighters not like he got spanked by any good welterweight he fought e.g benitez, Laing

 

These guys never actually watched the Leonard fight. They only watched the ko highlight. Hearns was working that ass til the very end.

 

Jaron Ennis is completely unproven to the point he shouldn't even be favoured over Crawford, let alone Tommy Hearns.

 

Just wow. If I can say anything for you at least you up the traffic flow on a thread.

 

I had crafted a legit answer, but i convinced myself you're simply trolling because..............nah

 

Amazing you actually have to explain that to someone who claims to be a boxing fan