Who would of won if they fought, Froch or Calzaghe?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BoxingFacts, Dec 11, 2019.


Who would of won if they fought, Froch or Calzaghe?

  1. Carl Froch

    10.9%
  2. Joe Calzaghe

    89.1%
  1. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    I know mate, I was responding to Aussie who was ducking the question

    SMW was very strong then. I would favour (going a bit later than the time you mentioned) Lacy to beat many of the current fighters at the weight today. He had a better resume than many today in the division with wins over Pemberton, Tsypko, Sheika, Vanderpool and Reid
     
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2021
  2. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    Eubank at that time had the best SMW resume ever at that point, far greater than anyone else who had fought in the division at that time
     
  3. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    He hadn't cut ties when he agreed to go to America and face Hopkins when they tried to make the fight years ago. He also hadn't cut ties when he did go to America and beat Hopkins, so you have no point or clue.
    Also what are you on about... Calzaghe beat Hopkins arguably sandwiched between his best wins of Tarver, Wright and Pavlik
    Hopkins was the champ at LHW and Calzaghe was closer to the end of his career
     
    gollumsluvslave and Somali Sanil like this.
  4. DancingLeftAndRight

    DancingLeftAndRight Member Full Member

    119
    114
    May 11, 2021
    Good fight. Gotta go with Joe's speed and workrate to win a decision.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2021
    gollumsluvslave likes this.