Who would win between Pea vs. PBF as they moved up..

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KuRuPT, May 10, 2012.


  1. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    I think this has to be razor thin decision anyway it's spun. I'd edge towards Whitaker, Mayweather is quicker/bigger/stronger, Whitaker is more fluid, better jab, better punch slipper.

    I'd love to see it

    Mayweather was a 19yo trying to make a name for himself. Whitaker was a crackhead toying with a 19yo kid and didn't particularly care


    This makes no sense in a H2H match up, unless you think Floyd got allot better at 140 and dropped off at 147, which didn't happen

    I'm guessing you're assessing their ability based on who they happened to fight at the weight, which is wrong in terms of H2H
     
  2. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    PP, PBF is quicker.... nah.. come on mang.. He's not quicker by any stretch of the imagination, in fact, I would say whitaker is faster. I agree it would be close though.
     
  3. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    135 - Whitaker
    140 - Whitaker
    147 - Whitaker
    154 - mayweather
     
  4. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    floyd also said a fight or 2 back.... `manny pacquiao, you are next`

    I wouldn`t get too excited about anything floyd says tbh + I`ve heard Pernell say about floyd... `he`s good but he ain`t no Pernell Whitaker`

    A great boxer talking themselves up over other great boxers isn`t exactly a shock, these guys are egotistical as ****.
     
  5. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Spot on. Bill did you score Pea vs. Vasquez... How did you score it?
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Mayweather isn't that quick now, but look at him circa 98-05, he's significantly quicker than Whitaker. I think I missed off his reach and height are rangier. Whitaker has a better jab, better reactions, better movement, better use of angles and more of a natural talent

    I still pick Whitaker to edge it, it could go either way
     
  7. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Can't really argue with most of that... we still disagree about the speed thing.. but that is neither here nor there when we agree on the conclusion.

    How do you think the Taylor from Chavez would look against Pernell? How do you see that going?
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,432
    21,863
    Sep 15, 2009
    No I think ability wise floyd carried his talents better as he got bigger. The higher the weight, the better his chances are.
     
  9. knockout artist

    knockout artist Boxing Addict banned

    6,846
    9
    Sep 24, 2011

    I think if they fought at 135, Mayweather would win, because Floyd would have Bob Arum's judges :nut
     
  10. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    I never did a round by round but I do remember feeling Whitaker deservd the win but not by as much as the commentators had it, it was quite close IMO, 154 didn`t suit Pernell at all.
     
  11. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    Pea takes probably all the way to 154. His straight left would do work.
     
  12. Lester1583

    Lester1583 Can you hear this? Full Member

    4,426
    27
    Dec 18, 2008
    It also seems like it would be more uncomfortable for Floyd fighting southpaw Whitaker than Whitaker fighting orthodox Floyd.
     
  13. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    I actually think this would be a very close fight, I don`t see Whitaker stopping Taylor like Chavez did but I don`t see him taking as much as Chavez did either, the more Pea can make Taylor box & exchange skills with him at a measured pace the better for Pea, Taylor for his part has to try to let his punches go in bunches & force the fight, similar to what he did vs Chavez, he will be made to miss & he will be countered silly at times but the sheer speed & volume of his punches will be a nightmare for Whitaker.

    This is not an easy one to call H2H... in close ones like this it`s best to back Whitaker I think, history is on his side as the greater, more versatile & more proven fighter... interesting fight tho for sure.
     
  14. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    I'm a massive Whitaker fan........But must admit that at welterweight the speed difference between Whitaker and Mayweather is highly notictable. Mayweather has much faster hands. You can even take a look at Whitaker's masterful display against Chavez, when he was in his prime welterweight days, and then look at Mayweather even last Saturday against Cotto and the handspeed difference is there for all to see. Mayweather looks a far fresher conditioned fighter, with faster hands and better reflexes and has looked the same for the last 5-6 years. I feel this may well be because Mayweather was a more disciplined fighter when it came to training and lives a cleaner lifestyle than Whitaker did.

    Whitaker's speed in some of fights at welterweight looked ordinary. I think he looked pretty quick against Chavez, McGirt II and De La Hoya and funnily enough his fight with Vazquez at light-middleweight, when I thought his jab was a lightning bolt. Perhaps, his substance abuse and lack of training, thus low motivation in the gym for his routine defenses made him slower than he could have been.
     
  15. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Floyd has faster hands for sure, but not reflexes or feet imo.

    The Whitaker of the Chavez fight is light years ahead of the Floyd we saw last week in those two departments imo.