Who would win, prime Tyson Fury or prime Vitali Klitschko?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Balder, Oct 10, 2021.


  1. Balder

    Balder Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,881
    1,893
    Nov 10, 2012
    It looks like the majority of posters feel different.
     
  2. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,223
    23,866
    Jul 21, 2012
    I only know McGrain and Unforgiven and i believe they voted for Fury.

    Anyway Vitali avoid tall guys for a reason.. Fury is all wrong for him. Its pretty clear if you understand the sport
     
  3. Balder

    Balder Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,881
    1,893
    Nov 10, 2012
    Wlad at age 41 gave Fury all he could handle.

    Vitali was a better fighter if not boxer. His chin would hold up against Fury, I think Vitali has a better inside game and has impressive power.

    But the big difference to me is work rate. Vitali is busy, aggressive , and nearly as hard to hit clean as Fury. Even if he gets hit, he wont go down ( never down in his career).

    Vitali is all wrong for Fury.
    Fury is a better boxer ( maybe) but he is not keeping Vitali off of him, outmuscling him in the clinches, nor is he knocking him out or outworking him.

    I have VK by decision - 8 rounds to 4. With one knockdown against Fury.
     
    BCS8, robert ungurean and surfinghb like this.
  4. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,223
    23,866
    Jul 21, 2012
    Get your facts straight. Wlad was 39 and would have retired his run without a loss had he fought B and C levellers like his brother
     
  5. Balder

    Balder Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,881
    1,893
    Nov 10, 2012

    Fury avoided a rematch with Wlad. Wlad is the longest reigning champ in the history of the sport. He fought the best there was out there and dominated....not close fights....Dominated. Even at age 39 ..( almost unheard of) he was the best in the division until Fury dethroned him. ( and it was a great fight)

    Vitali was even better, but older and more injury prone.
     
  6. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,223
    23,866
    Jul 21, 2012
    I suppose youre not going to tell me that Wlad avoided a rematch against Sanders who was 8 years past prime?
     
  7. Balder

    Balder Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,881
    1,893
    Nov 10, 2012
    LOL....I never thought about it. Vitali cleared that up anyway. In a rematch I would favor Wlad.

    Corrie was dangerous to anyone though.
     
  8. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,348
    11,388
    Jan 6, 2007

    Not so sure old Wlad can beat Sanders. The big South African would be in his head.

    And he might beat the Peter he edged in 2005, but I wouldn't bet much on it. He certainly wouldn't take him apart the way his brother did.

    And if Fury was facing the Vitaly of either the Peter or Lewis fights, I think Fury would have been in for a rougher night.

    Old Wlad was a lot more tentative and cautious, to the point of being frozen for much of his bout with Fury.

    Vitaly, while less skillful than little brother, was more aggressive and mentally tougher. He would be coming forward a lot more than Wlad was.


    Vitaly - Fury would be a great fight.

    If I had to bet, I'd go with the Ukranian.

    But I would be more than very happy if the big gypsy proved me wrong.
     
    Balder likes this.
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    And yet seven months before, Wladimir had looked absolutely excellent against Bryant Jennings, almost as if fighting Fury, the best fighter he ever met, was somehow more difficult for him.

    But I won't argue any more of your points. If you genuinely feel Vitali beat better fighters than Fury, I'll leave you to it. I will add that Fury beat the lineal champion of the world, a great one, something that Vitlai never did and that he beat a top three contender in the shape of Wilder, something Vitali Klitschko never managed to do and leave it there. He did have a couple of opportunities of course, but he always lost.
     
    dinovelvet likes this.
  10. surfinghb

    surfinghb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,626
    17,905
    Aug 26, 2017
    this
     
    Balder and robert ungurean like this.
  11. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,223
    23,866
    Jul 21, 2012
    What do you mean this? Wlad was neither 41 nor did he give Fury all he could handle.. Wilder and John McDermot troubled Fury more than Klitschko
     
  12. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,223
    23,866
    Jul 21, 2012
    https://i.gifer.com/origin/fc/fca24974083ad3f0f13f97acc86bda07_w200.gif

    He would be coming forward a lot more than his brother?? Whats this theory based on? Exactly what is Vitali going to do when he gets close to Fury since he can't box on the inside?? The man has zero inside game and he knows it
    Vitali has only one range and thats from the outside. He has to have space to get his punches off. He won't come forward on Fury because his only style was to box from range.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    I have to agree that the idea that Wladimir "gave him all he could handle" is odd at best.
     
    Colonel Sanders and dinovelvet like this.
  14. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,348
    11,388
    Jan 6, 2007
    Fury was more difficult for him and much of that was psychological.
    I expected Wlad to beat Fury, and judging by their meetings outside the ring leading up to the fight, I'm pretty sure Wlad expected to beat Fury.

    That changed when the fight started.

    For some reason, the dude froze when faced with the real life Fury across the ring.

    I kept waiting for Wlad to start.
    Two round in...three rounds in... then four, and I'm wondering, what's he playing at, he's leaving this a bit late.

    And he never really did get going till almost the end. And then it was too little, too late.

    Something about Fury got into his head when they finally met.

    I don't think that would have happened to Vitaly, who was much less fragile mentally than Wlad, and less worried about taking whatever Fury might throw.


    I didn't say that Vitaly beat better fighters than Wlad. This is the big knock on Vitaly...his resume is a bit weak on names.

    Wlad's is too, but it is better than Vitaly's and he did beat better fighters, albeit not as many.

    But who fought the better fighters was not my point.. I was making a case for Vitaly against Fury.

    I don't think you can extrapolate a Fury victory over Vitaly from the fight with the younger brother.
     
    Balder likes this.
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    Of course not.