Yes, I thought Mike was 27 when he got his azz handed to him by Evander the first time, but he was actually 30. My mistake. Either way he was still in his physical prime when a legit all time great handled him with relative ease, but congrats on being right on a inconsequetial point. Those things don't change the known and provable facts that Mike ducked George in the early '90's, his record clearly shows that he had a much harder time against bigger heavyweights, and that out of the 5 guys I would call legit champs in the 90's (Lewis, Holyfield, Moorer, Foreman and Bowe), Mike Tyson did not defeat a single one of them. The overall point being that even though Mike was clearly an outstanding fighter who was good enough to clean up a somewhat bad division in the late 80s, he is clearly over-rated by nut huggers like yourself and is ot an ATG, except in terms of fame, draw and interest he brought to the sport. Not sure how having this totally reasonable opinion makes me dumb, unless name calling is your automatic response to someone not agreeing with you delusional, totally nonsense based opinions. Not sure why I'm even responding to you, Id have more luck trying to teach Forrest Gump algebra. Just try to read slowly and ask your Mom for help if you must. Good luck:good
Broner Mayweather Joe Calzage(even in grainy security camera footage, I don't care) Rigo Carl Froch Adonis Stevenson Deontay Wilder David Haye Esirlandy Lara