Who would you prefer to watch: Wladimir Klitschko or Seth Mitchell? Why?

:good

Wladimir is a Champion, Mitchell just a contender.

Nothing to compare.

 

Mitchell would've been a champion in the 70's, 80's, or 90's when guys like Leon Spinks, Bonecrusher Smith, and Bruce Seldon reigned supreme but he is not in the same class as Wladimir Klitschko I'm afraid, and that is why I prefer to watch W. Klitschko fights even though Seth Mitchell is my favourite boxer.

 

You are losing the plot, Shaunster. You have been creating more Klit threads than the so-called fanboys

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYC_Wo1wkw4[/ame]


I will suck someone OFF

to have a prime version of this guy back

 

:barf

 

this !!

 

No, we get it.

The point of this thread is a smokescreen poll, so you have an excuse to once again rail against Wlad.

We get it, really.

Yawn ......

 

Seth's great entertainment, vulnerable, hard hitting, slick and black. The list is endless.

Wlads entrances are ****ing great. In fact i've just stumbled on a theory.

Wladimir Klitschko himself even clearly knows he has a become one of the most boring world class fighters in the history of the sport. On his way up through the ranks he was touted as a power punching killing machine, lets note that he then had cheap and plain entrances, lets compare it to to a bagel with no filling inside, none.

Once the MONEY DRIVEN fighter begun wheeling in the dough, he gives a massive "**** you ****s" to his fans by sacrificing the excitement we once saw in the ring to a ****ing ring entrance :roflatsch. The worst thing about this FRAUD is that his fans lapped it up as if nothing had happened once Wladimir started making that cheddar.

 

Klitschko is more capable, but Mitchell is far more entertaining to watch.