Who wrote this nonsense

Rest easy Rez I for one, wont be ripping off any of your analyses for other sites!

 

There are a few guys that like to surf the site with multiple alias and play games .. half a dozen guys here tell me they see their posts on other guys websites and Facebook Pages .. guess some have lot's of free time in their little lives.

 

Trust me, I'm not worried

 

I think I know who you're referring to. If so, I'm not too familiar with them, but it doesn't surprise me that a few people get sucked into these types of breakdown. I can think of another that might be wowed by the numbers.

The blog carries its message with the kind of arrogance that some people fall for as being authoritative. And, the presentation of the numbers helps with that appearance. But, it's a bit of a card-trick, with plenty of misdirection in the mix.

Even if the content were referred to, as being pseudo-scientific, that would be giving it vastly too much credit.

 

The point about taking and using content from other sites, seems valid. I mean, if one is going to tailor a hypothesis and the construct to disprove it, within the format of a single blog post, then the content is out there already.

Their post is more or less ready-made. Add a few convenient numbers and this is easy output.

 

Still can't believe Classics posters get angry at heavyweightblog. Its a cheap gag intended to fool new fans of boxing into thinking the Klits were gods.

 

Good Man!

 

Psuedo would be correct!lol