Who you would pick to be the p4p king if ....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Chuck Norris, Nov 6, 2016.


  1. Chuck Norris

    Chuck Norris Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,038
    37,196
    Aug 31, 2016
    Roman Gonzalez beats Cuadras again and Inoue
    Sergey Kovalev beats Ward and Stevenson
    Terence Crawford beats Pacquiao and winner of Thurman vs Garcia

    Out of the three scenarios who would you pick ?
     
  2. Bensub

    Bensub Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,527
    1,051
    Jan 17, 2015
    Kovalev easy.
     
    drenlou and Rumsfeld like this.
  3. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,341
    Feb 4, 2012
    Well Pacquiao is there to be beaten IMO, Vargas just isn't that good. I was fully expecting Brook to beat Vargas handily so aren't putting too much stock in yesterday's fight as a performance.

    I don't really rate Garcia either, I think he's there to be beaten by lesser fighters than Crawford. Thurman could prove a good scalp if he can prove he's above haircut in their fight.

    Inoue is an interesting one as I'll be interested to see how he comes back from his latest hand shattering.

    Ward is the biggest potential win off that list but I don't think beating up the overhyped, ageing Stevenson is worth any more than the others you've mentioned.
     
    alexthegreatmc and Chuck Norris like this.
  4. oiky

    oiky Gypsy Boy Full Member

    4,577
    1,619
    Jan 17, 2014
  5. Bad News Brit

    Bad News Brit Active Member banned Full Member

    1,342
    388
    Jul 25, 2016
  6. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    Kovalev. Ward would be the best win by far.
     
    KiwiMan likes this.
  7. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,588
    Apr 13, 2014
    Out of those 3.

    1. Kovalev
    2. Gonzalez
    3. Crawford
     
  8. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,043
    Oct 13, 2010
    Chocolatito. Easily

    Stevenson is over rated chicken **** garbage

    Brook beats all three of those welters
     
  9. mafioso

    mafioso Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,889
    620
    Jun 10, 2013
    golovkin when he beats jacobs saunder and canelo easily
     
  10. qwertyblahblah

    qwertyblahblah Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,985
    2,063
    Jan 14, 2013
    Almost certainly Roman, Kovalev, Crawford. Have to see the fights of course to say for sure. But I regard Inoue so highly that Kovalev even beating a guy as great and hard to beat as Ward wouldn't have to make him number 1.
     
  11. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,274
    38,052
    Aug 28, 2012
    I'd have to see how each one did it, but hypothetically I'd have to go with Gonzalez since he's still scaled more divisions than the other guys and already has a much better record. That's already his fourth division and he's undersized for it. Crawford would be normal sized for his third division if he moved up to welterweight and did what the OP describes. Kovalev is normal sized for his first division, so it's hard to give him pound for pound accolades no matter who he fought, especially since Ward is moving up to fight him.
     
  12. FuMaster

    FuMaster Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,910
    1,063
    Jun 10, 2016
    I'm one who doesn't give much credence to divisions in the lower weights. It's stupid to get a title when difference is less than 7 pounds. The pound difference in the lower divisions is so small that they should just be rid of them. The UFC gets that right. Someone moving from LHW to CW to HW is a HUGE undertaking.
     
    james5000 likes this.
  13. james5000

    james5000 2010's poster of the decade Full Member

    9,558
    3,677
    Apr 11, 2010
    I don't see why we have anything below 126 tbh, Grown men don't weigh less than 126, that is just gimmick midget boxing, it's easy to see why nobody cares for it
     
    Angler Andrew likes this.
  14. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,274
    38,052
    Aug 28, 2012
    It's percent of body mass. 3 pounds to a 105 pound guy is like 8 pounds to a 160 pound guy. Now, I'd be fine with only 8 divisions instead of 17 but that's not why the UFC only has 8 divisions. They don't have enough talent to fill 17 weight classes. Especially since the sport is largely drawing it's talent from the US and Brazil which doesn't have a lot of 5'2"-5'4" guys, they couldn't fill a whole division at the lower end. The talent pool for boxing is 7.5 times as big as it is in mma. There are literally thousands more professional boxers than there are mixed martial artists. We've got almost as many people competing at welterweight as there are competing in all eight mixed martial arts divisions. Basically, the reason why mma has such wide gaps between divisions is because their weight classes would have no depth otherwise.
     
    123HIT IT likes this.
  15. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,274
    38,052
    Aug 28, 2012
    Why have weight divisions at all? Why not just watch heavyweights if you don't care about the lower weight classes?