Who you would pick to be the p4p king if ....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Chuck Norris, Nov 6, 2016.


  1. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,084
    6,686
    Sep 8, 2010
    If this is the only information to work with, just the surface value results which I assume are all equally decisive victories, then Roman G.
     
  2. james5000

    james5000 2010's poster of the decade Full Member

    9,602
    3,723
    Apr 11, 2010
    3lbs=2.86% of 105, 8lbs=5% of 160

    Heck I **** 3lbs, I probably fluctuate 6-10lbs during the day and I only weigh around 212lbs

    UFC male divisions start @ 125lbs, and I am no MMA fan boy but they got that right
     
  3. RingKing75

    RingKing75 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,037
    5,152
    Dec 23, 2013
    You say something this ridiculous and expect people to believe you know anything about boxing and treat your opinions seriously? Your a joke.
     
  4. james5000

    james5000 2010's poster of the decade Full Member

    9,602
    3,723
    Apr 11, 2010
    Name me a household name that had an entire career 122 and below?
     
  5. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ

    94,757
    29,703
    Jan 18, 2010
    This.
    And Crawford, although I like him might not even claim 3
     
    Odins beard likes this.
  6. northpaw

    northpaw Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,568
    11,298
    Jun 5, 2010
    Kovalev, I think he's P4P # 1 currently anyway.
    Gonzalez's claim is tenuous at best, I don't think
    Crawford would get past Thurman, Porter, Spence or Brook
     
  7. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,324
    Nov 18, 2009
    Its really hard to judge P4P when it is like impossible for the best to fight the best these days.
     
  8. FuMaster

    FuMaster Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,910
    1,067
    Jun 10, 2016
    Agree about Gonzales. I would make Kovalev #1 if these scenarios played out.

    I disagree about Crawford. He probably would have problems with Spence and Brook because of their size and talent. I feel Crawford would beat Thurman and Porter. Still not convinced Thurman is the goods, although he has proven me wrong twice.
     
    drenlou likes this.
  9. northpaw

    northpaw Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,568
    11,298
    Jun 5, 2010
    I feel the same way about Crawford as you do about Thurman. I think Crawford is good, but Crawford has yet to fight a fighter (his size) firing on all cylinders (speed, power, can box on the front or back foot, good defensively)
    Brook, Thurman, Spence, all present him some very serious problems. And Porter is just a little monster with
    an engine that can wear you down. All of the WW's at the top level are stiff comp.
     
  10. RingKing75

    RingKing75 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,037
    5,152
    Dec 23, 2013
    Dumb question irrelevant to who is p4p the best fighter in the scenario presented and why your post was idiotic.
     
  11. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    78,122
    43,026
    Jan 22, 2015
    Kovalev, Crawford, Gonzalez. Gonzalez imo has to beat Estrada again, if Crawford was to beat Pac then the winner of Thurman/Garcia (who I think signifies the no.1 WW in the world) he'd have a good Argument, but Kovalev beating Ward and Stevenson gets my Vote..
     
    KiwiMan likes this.
  12. MoJoGoodie

    MoJoGoodie Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,905
    118
    Nov 29, 2011