Who'd have the better chance of winning: HOPKINS (v Hagler) or MAYWEATHER (v Sweet P)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Jan 15, 2009.


  1. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Who would you give the greater chance of winning between HOPKINS and MAYWEATHER in this hypothetical double-bill:



    BERNARD HOPKINS (the version who stopped Echols in 2000 and beat Trinidad in 2001)

    vs

    Marvin Hagler (who beat Minter in 1980 and Sibson in 1983)



    or



    FLOYD MAYWEATHER (who beat Castillo in the rematch in 2002 and N'Dou in 2003)

    vs

    Pernell Whitaker (who beat Haugen in 1989 and Nelson in 1990)




    Please vote and explain who you would give the greater chance of success between Hopkins and Mayweather.

    :bbb
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,807
    51,852
    Mar 21, 2007
    Bernard Hopkins has an excellent chance against Hagler, close to 50.50 that one for me.

    Mayweather should not be favoured against Whitaker, so for me the choice is easy - I see Whitaker as a clean favourite.
     
  3. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,518
    10,396
    Jun 23, 2008
    To say neither one has a chance is ******ed. But I could definitely see Hopkins beating Hagler more than I could Floyd beating Whitaker.

    Hopkins-Hagler is a pretty much a 50-50 fight.

    Whereas I'd favor Sweet Pea over Floyd by close decision,
     
  4. stonerose

    stonerose Guest

    Yeah i'd say Hopkins i reckon . Just a damn awkward fighter for anyone. I'd still have Hagler as favorite though.
     
  5. Biggame

    Biggame Active Member Full Member

    1,336
    0
    Mar 24, 2005
    I picked Mayweather because I in general think he'd beat Sweet Pea! I wonder why you picked those versions of the fighter?:huh
     
  6. LiamE

    LiamE Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,384
    3
    Nov 3, 2007
    Hopkins vs Hopkins 50:50? Who'da thunk it. :rofl
     
  7. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,954
    229
    Jun 2, 2007
    Hopkins but Hagler is still the favorite.
     
  8. Ted Stickles

    Ted Stickles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,248
    2,188
    Jun 24, 2007
    Hopkins has a better chance at victory than Floyd.....Sweat Pea could do a lot more things in the ring than Marvin and would be harder for Floyd to figure out
     
  9. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Pretty even actually.

    I would think Hagler starts as favourite against Hopkins, but as 'Nard could take his shots it would be interesting to see how he dealt with the awkwardness.

    Whitaker and Floyd are pretty similar, both great technicians in defence and attack, one subtle, the other flashy. Key for me is that Floyd is more 'judge-friendly' for some reason.
     
  10. gigogreco

    gigogreco Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,711
    4
    Jun 21, 2008
    i would actually favour hopkins over hagler.. so easy choice for me..
     
  11. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Because they are the best versions of each fighter at the weights they both fought at.
     
  12. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I'd fancy Hopkins to beat Hagler and I'd fancy Whitaker to beat Mayweather, so it's an easy choice for me too, but I thought I'd make the thread as my mate thinks the opposite - he takes Hagler and Mayweather to win.
     
  13. Williams27

    Williams27 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,582
    3
    Nov 18, 2008
    I would say Floyd only because if he fought a defensive fight he may be able to keep Sweet Pea at bay long enough to pull out a close decision. I dont think Hopkins would hold up to Haglers offense for 15 rounds, or even 12.
     
  14. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    That never happened, I do not recall that:D
     
  15. BigBarry

    BigBarry Grumpy Old Man Full Member

    496
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    No way does hopkins beat Hagler
    Mayweather has a better chance against Sweet Pea, but still doesnt win.