Whod win wlad vs norton?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by anarci, Sep 17, 2009.


  1. Loufatski

    Loufatski Boxing Junkie banned

    9,960
    6
    Jul 31, 2004
    Wlad would destroy Norton easily. CLOSE THE THREAD.
     
  2. CHEF

    CHEF Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,319
    133
    Aug 22, 2006
    you dont like Wlad fine, But to say "Wlad has NO heart" is just stupid:nut
     
  3. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Ridiculous post. Not worth serious discussion.
     
  4. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Absurd. :-(
     
  5. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,276
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
    Yeah that one! A much better fighter than Wlad.
    Beat Ali, was ripped off in the 3rd fight and came within an inch of beating a prime Larry Holmes. So yeah, much ****ing better than Wlad who is a dangerous but limited fighter.
     
  6. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Absolute nonsense. With Wlad's ATG jab & ATG power it would be nmore of a question of how many rounds would Ken survive before he was caught & brutally KO'd? Let's remember that Wlad isn't a puncher with a powerful right only, he has one of the best left hooks in the game. Another reasonable question would be "Which punch would Wladimir KO Norton with?"
     
  7. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Are we really comparing Wladimir's skill set & power to that of Jess Williard? That's also ridiculous.................
     
  8. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Sup Chef?!

    What makes these guys think Wlad has no heart? He got up from every knockdown every time. It's just blind hating.
     
  9. MemoCan

    MemoCan *****49ers Express***** Full Member

    4,924
    1
    Jul 20, 2008

    Really speaking of supporting glass jaws, weren't you the one also supporting Haye against Wlad?:nut:lol:

    Anybody who puts on a pair of gloves, gets in the ring and makes it a career has all the heart in the world. If it was that easy, everybody would be doing it.

    Pacquaio got knocked out by Torrecampo and Singsurat-not world level fighters either, what the **** is your point?:nut

    DC:!:
     
  10. grouch

    grouch Member Full Member

    362
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    ****** alert!!!
     
  11. grouch

    grouch Member Full Member

    362
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    Wlad is miles ahead of Forman at any point of his career. Different league.
     
  12. djm

    djm Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,208
    2
    Dec 17, 2006
    Sorry, guy, you're squandering credibility here. The Peter Wlad fought was a solid, fit fighter. Asthmatic? What, now you're just making things up? D-level? Just because his wheels fell off after his title win doesn't make him retroactively useless.

    As for Norton, prime for prime, this is a pick'em fight to me. A decision to Norton or a mid-round TKO to Wlad. 60/40 Norton over 15 rounds when he can manage the pace, 60/40 Wlad in 12 when he can press better.
     
  13. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    184
    May 16, 2009

    no dumb ass read all the post's
     
  14. David the

    David the Fat Bastard Full Member

    396
    0
    Aug 25, 2009
    Comparisons are always difficult,and there is a almost hero worship of the Klitschko brothers around here which I cant really agree with.I think that if your going to compare fighters from different eras look at the quality of the opponents in there comparitive eras and how they faired in that time and using that comparison I would say Norton should win quite comfortably..................
     
  15. grouch

    grouch Member Full Member

    362
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    Here! Here! I got one, I got one!!!!!