Wlad, ugly and relatively early. Maybe not Foreman, Shavers, or Cooney early because that's not his style, but Norton wouldn't see the second half of the fight.
:good Wlad has a great heart, a heart of a real Champion. He was on the canvas, but always gets up. He had very bad days in the boxing ring but he fights his way back. He never never quit in a fight. He was so tired against Brewster auf 4 rounds but he began the 5th round and did not quit. Against Puritty he was tired after the 10th round but he did not quit! This shows how great his heart is. To say he has not heart is stupid nothing else.
Norton didn't even have nearly the skillset of Foreman, after that one matured a bit and picked up a jab. Wildly swinging, and wide open. Sure the type of fighter who would "easily beat Wlad". In every stupid Klitschko haters dreams.
Im not sure pac would ko him but willard would probably get knocked out by butterbean . Majority of those old time big heavy weights couldnt fight there way out of a wet paper bag!!!
I mostly watch the Heavys. Wlad's left hook is the current best at HW and easily top 10 p4p. If you disagree name 10 better:
you dumb ass ,i did not compare skills some one else stated that modern heavys were too big for the heavy's of previous generations hence the use of dempsey and willard comparison
dont you find it dull no real depth in the heavys at the moment who should i watch out for as dont really follow modern heavys