Not necessarily a case of who do you think will go the furthest or who is the best (personally I dont see how anyone could choose Fury as the answer to either) but who would you prefer to be the better out of the two? Would you prefer Price? Cleaner image, comes across as nicer, no doubt the technically better boxer..... But boring as a plank. Would you prefer Fury..... Funny guy, takes offence to everything, creates a media circus whenever he speaks.......... But doesnt look as though he'd do as much on the 'World Stage'
I prefer Price. Seems like a nice lad, and think he has genuine potential. Don't really like or rate Fury, but he is funny, and therefore entertaining - purely for the things he comes out with.
Fury was set to fight Boystov. Price is fighting Thompson next. Fury is burning him when it comes to opponents.
As far as personality goes it's Fury. If that's what the question is anyway. A far more entertaining character....and character is something David Price certainly isn't. Plus, I could never be a fan or friendly to a fighter who comes into that bloody "You'll never walk alone" That's not to say I disrespect him as a fighter, although if he neglects his boxing because he's a thunderous puncher, he won't fulfill the potential he possibly has.
Fury all the way, what you see is what you get with the big man. Price is too condescending in nature, the way he patronizes opponents after hes beaten them up, that grinds yon gears!
Wouldnt bet on the outcome between these 2,though opponent wise,Fury for me a good way in front and more deserving of a shot,especially if he wins tomorrow,which I expect.At the moment Price is coming across as the one who isnt trash talking and the nicer guy.Strangely,most of Furys talk is for me publicity stuff,and the bad stuff about Tony mainly a reaction to the coward statement,which no boxer would take kindly to.At the end of it all,in years to come,theyll shake hands.Id bet on that.