Whom do you support more, David Haye or Carl Froch?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Hagler/Pryor, Oct 23, 2009.


  1. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Jul 4, 2007
    face it.. he's got nothing compared to some of the fighters in his division.. even you scored Dirrell winning.. I know your loyal, and I respect that. But some people overrate his acheivements..
     
  2. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    I can't stand either one of them. This time last year I was a huge Haye fan, now I think he's a twat but I still like him better than Froch cause at least he's a skilled twat whereas Froch is a walking meathead who can't box if his life depended on it.
     
  3. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,088
    10,497
    Jul 28, 2009
    I'm not really a fan of either one also but I say Haye, because Haye is more needed in the HW division than Froch is at Super Middleweight. Needed as in he helps generate the buzz and the excitement.
     
  4. Irishbc

    Irishbc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,177
    1
    Mar 15, 2009
    Haye is miles better and has much more potential though
     
  5. 2tall2slow2

    2tall2slow2 Guest

    Interesting poll. Hmmm
     
  6. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    both exciting fighters to watch...

    I picked Haye... love him to spark the heavyweight division
     
  7. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,499
    Jan 22, 2009
    No offense,Tommy,but that that's not saying much.Taylor has already been knocked out by Pavlik at middleweight.It's not as if he's some great fighter.And Taylor was beating Froch on points going into the final round,although it was closer than most Taylor supporters would have claimed.Personally,I believe Bute should have been in the tourney rather than Jermaine.
     
  8. Healy

    Healy Former Wee Poof

    3,196
    0
    Feb 13, 2006
    Haye by a long way
     
  9. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
  10. djm

    djm Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,208
    2
    Dec 17, 2006
    Leave it to an Englishman to butcher the English language in his jingoistic poll.

    If someone could gurantee me that Haye doesn't sit on the WBA and defend against King stooges, then I'm certainly cool with him winning. A Haye/Klit fight would be great for the entire sport.

    Nothing against Frochy, but if he exceeds all expectations then SMW isn't all it's cracked up to be. That's ALOT of fights to tough out based on guts alone.
     
  11. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    I dont like either one but id have to pick Haye because at least he has talent and looks to have the goods,despite his suspect chin. Froch sucks BALLS!!
     
  12. NJ1979

    NJ1979 Likes monkeys Full Member

    0
    0
    Aug 14, 2008
    You should have put 'lol' at the end of that post, just to reinforce your credibility a bit more.
     
  13. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    7,308
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    That sums up how I see it.

    Froch is marginally less offensive and marginally funnier too. Haye is a better boxer but Froch has more balls.
     
  14. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    Man im the most Credible Vato in the Mutha ****in House!! Just keep listening and you will see!
     
  15. Rangersfan1982

    Rangersfan1982 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,832
    1
    May 28, 2009
    Being British, I'm a fan of both. But Haye's my favorite.