Who's #1 P4P after May>

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Brutalwayz, Feb 17, 2010.


Page 13 of 14
  1. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    Do you think I would be bothered debating with you?

    From your posts alone, you are bordering on Nallege-proportions already.

    That is why I said you probably should be a floydette if you are not one already! Stupid.

    Let's start with the traits that you have :

    1. You do not know how to construct proper sentences.

    2. Your train of thought is actually closer to a train wreck than a train on the track.

    3. You throw invectives when you can not debate.

    4. A four year old would have more logical thought process than you are.

    Why don't you log off, go to school and come back a better man instead of staying in ESB and be the "bitter" man..
     
    pejevan, Feb 18, 2010
    pejevan, Feb 18, 2010
    #181
  2. Brutalwayz

    Brutalwayz Active Member Full Member

    1,178
    2
    Feb 12, 2010
    Seeing as you haven't done anything, but try to attack me with every reply, yes I think you are bothered with debating me.

    I don't even know anything about Nallege and haven't seen enough of his post to even comment that, so **** it. :conf

    Dude I'm neither a floydette nor a *******. I'm someone that posted a question that interested me. You seem to be the only one that thinks this question is a dumb post.

    1.You're second sentence is a fragment, and you have the balls to talk about me?

    2. My train of thought has more commonsense than yours even when I'm sleeping.

    3.You haven't even debated anything I said YET!! You've just TRIED to make everything I say sound dumb, but instead you made yourself sound like a ****.:-(

    4. Once again you talk about my sentences and that sentence makes no sense (Your verbs don't match and you need an the word a after have.) ANYWAYS, what is your logic? What point have you tried to make? I posted a ****ing question and you say it has no logic, but most people that replied will say this was a good question regardless of what their answers were.

    You're the bitter one here man. I was fine until you came being a dik for no reason other than that you are one.:cus
     
    Brutalwayz, Feb 19, 2010
    Brutalwayz, Feb 19, 2010
    #182
  3. totsboy

    totsboy Active Member Full Member

    1,150
    0
    Aug 2, 2009
    lol morales who got destroyed by pac in 3 rounds..what an idiot..
     
    totsboy, Feb 19, 2010
    totsboy, Feb 19, 2010
    #183
  4. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    No offense but you really need to go back to school!

    You want to go tit-for-tat with me on English grammar?

    You obviously lack reading comprehension and I stopped debating with you when you threw this argument :

    "When did Mosley fight Hatton? Thats right...NEVER!!"

    Seriously, you were not doing fine before I came nor after that. Just count the number of posts calling you idiot!
     
    pejevan, Feb 19, 2010
    pejevan, Feb 19, 2010
    #184
  5. kingmiller8282

    kingmiller8282 Active Member Full Member

    1,105
    12
    Nov 15, 2009
    No IDIOT Morales that boxed Pac's Rat Ears off...
     
    kingmiller8282, Feb 20, 2010
    kingmiller8282, Feb 20, 2010
    #185
  6. stiga

    stiga Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,654
    0
    May 27, 2009
    Manny stays on top
     
    stiga, Feb 20, 2010
    stiga, Feb 20, 2010
    #186
  7. sprika2

    sprika2 Active Member Full Member

    1,211
    0
    Apr 28, 2006
    there is a good case for FMW-Mos winner being num 1 after may because they are the 2 and 3 p4pboxers.
     
    sprika2, Feb 20, 2010
    sprika2, Feb 20, 2010
    #187
  8. kingmiller8282

    kingmiller8282 Active Member Full Member

    1,105
    12
    Nov 15, 2009
    :good:good
     
    kingmiller8282, Feb 21, 2010
    kingmiller8282, Feb 21, 2010
    #188
  9. doubleplaidinum

    doubleplaidinum Maravilla Full Member

    8,397
    0
    Mar 31, 2008
    this.
     
    doubleplaidinum, Feb 21, 2010
    doubleplaidinum, Feb 21, 2010
    #189
  10. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    When did it start working this way? Was there an official memo?
     
    Cobbler, Feb 21, 2010
    Cobbler, Feb 21, 2010
    #190
  11. PBA

    PBA Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,670
    5
    Jan 11, 2010
    It's clearly the Mayweather-Mosley winner. "Beat the man to be the man" is the most ridiculous logic I've ever heard (in situations like this) - especially in P4P rankings. What if Hopkins was No.1 would Floyd or Shane have to beat him? (Not a real question obviously).

    And obviously Floyd would have the much stronger case since he beat everybody Pac beat in the last 2 years (except Cotto) and add to that the much more difficult recent opponent (if/when he beats Shane). How couldn't Floyd be No1 P4P?
     
    PBA, Feb 21, 2010
    PBA, Feb 21, 2010
    #191
  12. Brutalwayz

    Brutalwayz Active Member Full Member

    1,178
    2
    Feb 12, 2010
    Thank you someone doesn't have amnesia
     
    Brutalwayz, Feb 21, 2010
    Brutalwayz, Feb 21, 2010
    #192
  13. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    So it is subtraction now?

    3-2 = 1, therefore number 1?

    Unless they defeat the number 1, then the number 1 remains number 1.

    Mayweather defeated the number 2 in JMM, and he did not become number 1! How come that he becomes number 1 by defeating number 3? Is there a weird logic to it?
     
    pejevan, Feb 22, 2010
    pejevan, Feb 22, 2010
    #193
  14. Brutalwayz

    Brutalwayz Active Member Full Member

    1,178
    2
    Feb 12, 2010
    :stfu
     
    Brutalwayz, Feb 22, 2010
    Brutalwayz, Feb 22, 2010
    #194
  15. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    Did you go back to school already moron?

    Logic is really not your strong point!

    Lesson number one :
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin"]
    This content is protected
    [/ame]
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
    pejevan, Feb 22, 2010
    pejevan, Feb 22, 2010
    #195
Page 13 of 14