Who's a better all round fighter, Pacquao or Calzaghe?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Canibus81, Oct 27, 2009.


  1. simmmo

    simmmo Member Full Member

    192
    0
    Oct 5, 2009

    this sums it up. good post.
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    Pac is more versatile than Calzaghe. Pac boxed on the outside against Oscar and Diaz. He countered against Hatton. He swarmed Barrera. He played rope-a-dope against Cotto. He slugged it out with Morales in the rematch. He does it all man.

    You can say "Pacquiao is mainly a graet slugger" but also "Calzaghe is mainly a high volume puncher". Versatility is about being able to do what you are mainly not. Calzaghe can get on his toes and box on the outside, thats true. But Pac can do that too.

    On the flip side Calzaghe can't counter like Pac. He can't do a rope-a-dope like Pac. He can't go punch for punch like Pac.

    Get my drift? Pac on a whole other level in every facet of his game.
     
  3. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    51,634
    17,169
    Mar 5, 2006
    Cal does have the "0" something Pac doesn't have.
     
  4. simmmo

    simmmo Member Full Member

    192
    0
    Oct 5, 2009
    pac came from nothing in the philippines. fighting pro since he was 16. he didn't have daddy to show him how to box. he didn't have no amateur career.

    He does have the better opponents on his record.
     
  5. Moth

    Moth Guest

    Calzaghe's got great skills, but he paws with his punches too much. If he went against an opponent who could walk through most punches (Pavlik) I think we'd have seen him lose that "0".
     
  6. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    5
    Jul 12, 2009
    Pacquiao has far more punching power and the edge in speed and has succeeded at more weights against a better level of opposition, he has also tested his chin against bigger punchers. Calzaghe is awkward and probably better than most people give him credit for but sadly he decided not to showcase his skills against the top fighters of his time so Pacquiao, clearly.
     
  7. Sting

    Sting Akagami no Shanks Full Member

    2,998
    0
    Jan 19, 2008
    Where the hell has this Bazooka guy gone to?

    I remember he was always hating on Pac. But after Pac beat Cotto, he just up and vanished.

    Poor guy.
     
  8. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
    I voted 4 Pac but I can easily see why sum voted Calzaghe.
    Facing better opposition doesn't neccesserily mean you're a better all-round boxer.
    Mayweather hasn't fought as good opposition as Pac.
     
  9. hooligan

    hooligan Millionaire Bum Full Member

    4,499
    10
    May 8, 2006
    he didnt fought the best...and stayed at a prticular weight almost his entire carrer, in his own backyard to boot..

    some would say he didnt beat bhop...
     
  10. randeris

    randeris Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,339
    0
    Nov 20, 2007
    Why should he not? Cotto and Quartey are fairly even.
     
  11. randeris

    randeris Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,339
    0
    Nov 20, 2007
    so does David Rodriguez, does that mean he is better than Pac?
     
  12. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    86
    Sep 3, 2007
    You forgot to do an open poll + Pac has a lot of fans here on the general, Calzaghe has a lot of haters.

    Pac is certainly greater but both know how to fight & win well, both guys would be nightmares to face in their weight class, Pac is dangerous in so many ways, can take you out in a flash, never stops coming & Calzaghe is very very awkward, good at adapting & like Manny, great stamina & never stops until the job is done.

    I voted `even` because the other 2 options say `definitely better` which I dont agree with... I probably could have choosen one over the other if the options never said `definitely.`
     
  13. simmmo

    simmmo Member Full Member

    192
    0
    Oct 5, 2009

    don't sit on the fence... one of these fighters will become a legend and mentioned in 50 years time. the other won't. you don't need me to tell who which one is which.
     
  14. pugilist64

    pugilist64 Guest

    What a stupid question Joe Calzaghe is way more versatile that Pacquao but no doubt Pacman will recieve 90% of the votes due to the the usual bitter Yank posters.
     
  15. Moth

    Moth Guest

    Joe Calzaghe never fought the kind of talent that Pacman has fought. Watch Danny Green v. Roy Jones, Andre Ward v. Mikkel Kessler, Roy Jones v. Jeff Lacy for the evidence of this.

    Bitter Yanks.... psh.