Who's a better fighter, Jermaine Taylor or Bernard Hopkins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Canibus81, Mar 14, 2009.


  1. doubleplaidinum

    doubleplaidinum Maravilla Full Member

    8,397
    0
    Mar 31, 2008
    that being said, hopkins is definitely the better fighter.
     
  2. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,866
    3,117
    Apr 16, 2005

    You gotta be kidding me. Taylor got two bogus gift decisions over Hopkins and hasn't done anything other than get beaten by Kelly Pavlik since. :patsch

    There is no comparison. Hopkins is an ATG. Taylor is an HBO-created FRAUD.
     
  3. slamus

    slamus Member Full Member

    176
    0
    Mar 14, 2009
    Trinidad is the better fighter.

    But

    Bhop is the master of controlling fights.

    Answer... both in their won way.
     
  4. Detroit

    Detroit Get Money Full Member

    2,655
    0
    Nov 7, 2008
    B-Hop.........hands down:patsch
     
  5. Detroit

    Detroit Get Money Full Member

    2,655
    0
    Nov 7, 2008
    :dealI agree..i think JT is SO OVERRATED
     
  6. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    Hopkins is better because of the totality of his career. Funny how Hopkins has proven since Taylor how he is better than Taylor, not really before. Had Taylor beaten Wright and Tarver and Pavlik and lost to Calzaghe, he will look better than his losses to Pavlik and draw with Wright.
     
  7. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    I don't think he is overrated. He beat Hopkins twice. I think he burned himself out early. I am not sure he can ever get it back. He fought too much and had tough fights.
     
  8. fitzgeraldz

    fitzgeraldz And the new Full Member

    21,873
    3
    Feb 27, 2008
    if they fought 10 times the result would be the same, a close UD by Taylor ... Hopkins is better technically, but head to head, Taylor is far superior.

    i don't think the fight with Pavlik proved anything with either fighter, Pavlik showed that he wasn't that dope -- I also think that Taylor beat Pavlik the second time around ... politics played a part in that ... he's the latest american "white" champion ... the last I can't say who's the last ... maybe, Tommy Morrison?
     
  9. Jennifer Love Hewitt

    Jennifer Love Hewitt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,850
    2,149
    Jul 19, 2004
    Hopkins proved he was a better fighter when he beat Taylor.
     
  10. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    surely to ****ing christ this is a joke??????
     
  11. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I don't even know where to start with this statement. You require urgent medical assistance.
     
  12. cpnasty

    cpnasty Fight Fan 83 Full Member

    4,663
    5
    May 1, 2005
  13. yesihavearm2

    yesihavearm2 ESB Chinchecker Full Member

    9,890
    5,155
    May 30, 2008
    I cant believe this is an actual thread. Taylor got 2 gift decisions against a Hopkins who was dead at the weight and unmotivated.

    Hopkins only the proved this by shutting out Pavlik.
     
  14. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Put 2001 Hopkins in with any version of Taylor, and this wouldn't even be an issue. Same if it had been 2001 Hopkins fighting Calzaghe. When a man is over 40, he is not the same physical specimen he was in his mid 30s, it's just human nature.
     
  15. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Hopkins was ripped off by the judges when he fought Taylor. He is the better fighter by far.