Who's better, a primE daniel santos or the bhop that fought joe ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by freddy-wak, Jan 30, 2009.


  1. freddy-wak

    freddy-wak M O D E R A T O R Full Member

    36,443
    29
    Oct 28, 2004
    Simple ****en question

    i was comparing margo's move up to 154 loss (controversial) , to pavliks 170 fight with BHOP....i know bhop looked amazing that night, but that dont erase his last 6 or 7 shitty ass fights....

    anyways, i was just asking cause margo seems to get called every name in the book cause of that loss (mainly by people who probably never even seen that fight)...he also gets **** for being a big welter, whiile pavlik is a ****en huge middle.......anyways, no arguments, just answer the poll question....thanks
     
  2. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    You shoulda posted the thread explaining why you're asking this question. Cause you know, some dummies are gonna try to bash you sicne they dont understand your reason for asking such a difficult question.

    By the way, you didnt vote.
     
  3. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
  4. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
  5. freddy-wak

    freddy-wak M O D E R A T O R Full Member

    36,443
    29
    Oct 28, 2004
    wow, i'm starting to think you guys have never seen a prime santos in action....a smooth southpaw with nice power all of sudden is nothing compared to a hugging, rabbit punching bhop...
     
  6. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    Hopkins of course.

    This is just an attempt to "remind" people of how legendary and dangerous Margarito and his opponents are. :rofl

    Santos is a very good fighter, no doubt about it but Hopkins also put Calzaghe in good enough trouble in that fight, an undefeated Calzaghe.
     
  7. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    Hopkins is a better boxer than Santos period, though Daniel Santos overral is very very underrated.
     
  8. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    What do you mean 'last 6 or 7 shitty' fights.

    I thought he looked pretty good against Winky, and impressive against Tarver. The last fights before that were at MW.

    I've seen the quote, you specifically said 'old ass Hopkins'. He was still old against Pavlik, he didn't use a ****ing time machine.

    On that basis, you compared a prime Daniel Santos to the Hopkins of now, not specifically the Hopkins of the Calzaghe fight, so don't go twisting your words against making a statement and telling somebody you quote you on it.

    The Hopkins of now is a better fighting than a prime Santos, even though the Puerto Rican is an excellent fighter and very under-rated.

    Margarito lost that fight because he can't handle a natural 154.
     
  9. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    Hopkins at any point of his career is better than Santos.
     
  10. carras

    carras Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,596
    0
    Jul 22, 2004
    santos is very good, but not hops is on another level
     
  11. Thom

    Thom Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,621
    21
    Jun 25, 2006
  12. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,179
    Jun 23, 2005
    Hopkins Freddy and its not close. This is one of the worst arguments you've ever tried to make here. So bad infact I added it to my sig. Let it go.:-(
     
  13. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
  14. ghostlybadge

    ghostlybadge Punch Drunk Full Member

    1,984
    80
    Dec 9, 2007
  15. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008