Who's better, a primE daniel santos or the bhop that fought joe ?

B-Hop...

Dzinziruk beat a prime Santos decisively and most US fans calling the Ukrainian a no-name inferior boxer to P-Will... :roll:

 

Youre kidding?

Thats the worst fight I've seen.

 

Not talking about the quality of the fight, I'm talking about the performance. Hopkins did what he needed to do to beat a very good fighter comprehensively.

 

Santos is good man but Hopkins even after he lost to Joe was still considered a top5 p4p fighter by many. that means he was still one of the 5 best fighters in the world. Santos even in his prime was never that good.

Santos is good and also a 3 time champion but he is not BHop even though BHop is 43


And i saw Margo vs Santos in fact i have it on my computer. Santos wins a dodgy technical split decision in a fight he would have lost if not for a dodgy stoppage when Margo was starting to take over the fight. And the worst part is he outweighed Margo by 10 ****ing pounds. He's good but don't tell me he's better than Hopkins even if Hopkins is past his best.

 

lol

 

:-(

 

in the words of the legendary Apollo Creed

"You fight great, I'm a great fighter"...and that's the situation here when you compare the two, though Santos maybe hugely underated, he's no Hopkins

 

LoL. Its funny that the 6 guys that voted for Santos didnt even have the balls to give their opinion.

 

I've never seen Santos but hopkins was utter **** in the JC fight so I voted for Santos

 

Pavlik and Margarito are about equally overrated. At least on ESB.

 

Yep. It depends on who has fought most recent. Whoever has fought most recently is gonna be the one who's more overrated.