Who's better, Froch or Margarito?

I dont rate people if they cheat to win... Froch is better

 

this.

 

Margo would murder him, froch is static & has no defence of any note that could withstand Margo's assault, Margo has the punch/chin/stamina & he gets froch out of there in 6:bbb

 

:deal I really doubt that Margarito has done this throughout his career. If Froch fought at WElter hed get a serious beat down against Cotto. HE d be Pick em against even Cintron. 2 guys that Margarito brutally knocked out. Not to mention Sergio martinez(who Margarito knocked out). Margarito also fought WIlliams pretty even someone that would kick the crap out of Froch even with the weight differance (if he came in at mIddle) . I think Margarito will prove people wrong that think hes a cheater.

 

a WW Froch would not be pick em against Cintron.. Kermit would be a 10-1 favorite, he punches straight and has scary ass power. If he can hit you you're gone, unless you're a freak like Margo with a cast iron chin.

I've seen Froch fight twice, which doesn't make me an expert, but he looks to me like a guy who's just killing time until he gets knocked out by the first guy he faces with good fundamentals, good stamina and decent speed and power. It wouldn't take someone extraordinarily talented, just someone with a good all around game and the heart to deal with his pressure. I'm still super pissed at Dirrell for the way he fought, embarassing to get beat by Froch when you have that much talent.

 

but he loaded up for Cotto , Cintron (twice) , Williams , Martinez , and who knows who more ? probably every time.