Who's better: Guzman or Valero?

Anyone who says Valero should be banned for life.

Guzman TKO5. Valero is a joke.

 

serious '?'?

 

gooseman by a mile

 

atschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatsch

 

atschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatschatsch

 

Yes, but I favor, meaning I prefer to watch. :good

 

You guys better knock it off or poor Amsterdam is liable to patsch his own head off!

Really goofy question. :-(

 

It's more like asking 'who's better - Margarito or Thomas Hearns'.

Remember, Mayorga actually had some ability at his very best.

 

All this ignorance disgusts me.

Mayorga makes Valero look like a technician but he didn't have a problem beating the technically sound Forrest twice, did he?

Guzman having more skills doesn't mean that he'll beat Valero and it sure doesn't mean that he's the better fighter.

 

Mayorga actually had speed, an iron jaw, good timing despite bad technique and good handspeed when he fought Forrest.

Valero is 3 steps down from a prime Mayorga.

 

considering valero has'nt proved himself against anyone of note, guzman is leagues above the hype that is valero. this is'nt even debatable.

 

How many Valeros are there? So beating a champion loco mosquera in Panama was nothing?

 

Guzman by miles . . . no comparison.

:yep

 

commendable, but against the elite his skills are'nt up to par. guzman is elite so this is'nt even worth discussing. i'm not even a fan of guzman.

 

Guzman by far actually.