Who's better: Guzman or Valero?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Asterion, Dec 29, 2007.


  1. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007
    valerho shouldnt have anyone picking him fo this question
     
  2. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    . . . like comparing a Cadillac to a Toyota. :D :yep
     
  3. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    Valero is being underrated. Skills dont always pay the bills...just look at george foreman in his prime. Valero has the intangibles to win fights. If this guy can beat Morales in sparring and MAB believes he can beat Pacman, having knockout all his opponents most in the 1st and being a champion...he has to be something special.

    Guzman rests too much and looses concentration. He also does get hit and when Valero hits him, hes gonna slow down alot.
     
  4. Haye

    Haye Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,928
    2
    Oct 11, 2007
    Guzman, obviously.
     
  5. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Stick to the question buddy. Who's better? Better as in all around fighting skills. :lol:
     
  6. huki

    huki huk huk ^_^;; Full Member

    6,475
    2
    Nov 12, 2006
    I thought you were joking in your first post. Valero is the biggest hypejob in boxing. I can't believe he was featured on Yahoo's front page after he knocked out another C- level fighter in the early rounds this month. He's nothing special.. watch the Mosquera fight. I think it might be on youtube.

    Guzman would not only be able to beat Valero using his countering boxer-puncher style, he would be able to beat him in an all out toe to toe brawl. Valero is ****.
     
  7. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006

    Hi there black! :hi:


    Why the change of nick all of a sudden?
     
  8. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    Valero is a classic case of a top fighter not having had the chance yet to prove himself. Before guzman beat Barrios who would have thought we would be comparing him with the likes of JMM, MAB & Pac? Sure Valero looks crude but his tenacity and punching power makes up for it.

    Guzman will win most of the rounds but I see Val landing some clean shots on Guzman and as Guzman slows down towards the end, Valero will land more often which may lead to a TKO.

    I picked Guzman to beat Soto and the fight went pretty much exactly as I said it would. Soto is too much a calculated solid boxer to maul Guzman down, he also doesnt posses the raw power of Valero. Valero's wild style would benefit him against Guzzy, no point in trying to box with Guzman. Only one in the FW-LW division that can outbox Guzman is JMM at this point.
     
  9. greengloves

    greengloves Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,421
    0
    Dec 2, 2007
  10. denisq

    denisq New Member Full Member

    50
    0
    May 21, 2006