Who's greater Hopkins or Morales?

Agreed, a 26 year old Barrera at his absolute peak & a 26 year old very good Pacquiao on his record pisses all over anything Hopkins has done.

 

:rofl

you guys getting owned 8)

 

bull****...in what way ?

morales has never, i mean never pulled the ***** **** bhop has pulled fight after fight....morales has real balls, money made bhop grow a little pair, but couldn't keep him from showing his true ***** colors......

 

+What Pacquiao managed to archieve after getting beaten by morales:good

 

Thats because your a ****in clown & no **** respects you, your thread backfired dickhead

 

Bull**** assumption, 160 was his best fighting weight he made it easily just because his first fight was north of 175 it doesn't mean he should have stayed there, he never struggled to make 160 untill he reached his 40's with this kind of ******ed logic we may aswell say Tommy Hearns should never have fought at welter and instead should have started at MW.

He didn't drop down to fight smaller men atschatsch he has admitted he wasn't giving 100% that's why he took a break after his first fight and came back 2 years later for one last shot at boxing IN SHAPE and like I said he never struggled to make 160lbs at the start of his career so I don't know why you're making such a big deal out of it.

Morales had to move up he couldn't fight at 122lbs for too long because of his rather long frame the same with moving up again from 126lbs to 130lbs but it was always smartly done (his moving up) because he was successful in each weight he fought at but each time he went up a little bit of the spark left him 122lbs and 126lbs Morales was a superior fighter to 130lbs Morales but 130lbs Morales was still good enough to beat Pacquiao but it was at this point the miscalulation was made since he needed to move up to 135lbs strait away but instead for 3 strait fights he struggled badly to make the 130lbs (and the 133lbs catchweight against Raheem) this effectivly ruined him as an elite fighter IMO.

What you see now is a shell of what he was, but it just shows you how good Morales was/is because even though he's badly faded and fighting way above his prime weight he's still good enought to push the elites at 140lbs all the way.

 

No, now you're the one being stupid.

Let's be real, Morales is one of the most loved boxers on this forum and for some stupid reason you decided to put him a poll against Bernard Hopkins a fighter who a lot of people turned against after his last fight and now you're all upset calling people bigots because the poll results don't reflect your personal opinion.

 

dude, it wouldn't of mattered, ever !!!

nobody has ever really liked hopkins, and he's to blame for that, not the fans....**** him

 

bhop

 

Post Pascal he got a lot of dick riders, A LOT. They were everywhere on this forum with their 'Hopkins a G' bulll**** I knew these bandwagoners would drop off sooner or later and it turned out to be sooner. With me being an actual Hopkins fan who's still a Hopkins fan I could spot them easily and call them out on their bandwagon antics but I never said **** to anyone who was a Hopkins hater from before people like HEADBANGERS, Wig etc. are actually posters worth respecting for their consistency.

 

Who are you trying to convince? yourself? atsch

 

Ok I see what you're doing, **** i'm losing my touch I should have spotted this **** a few posts back. :verysad