PP,im sorry to say you are the most biased 'serious' poster on here. While you obviously are not a general forum guy,and you have good knowledge,you seem to make arguments only to suit your pre-judged opinion. Thats why im going to give you a bit of sincere advice,if you want to give your opinion/propoganda on 'your' favourite fighters thats cool,but dont dress it up as 'logical','factual' or 'unarguable'. Like nieztsche says,'make your own meaning for the earth',but dont try to make your meaning my meaning...
Pacquaio isnt 1 of my favourates so your way off, I dont like his style I just rate him highly with everything hes done. I don't rate pre 40s era particularly highly, the evidence points to it being an inferior era
Yeh Benny Leonard, Jack Dempsey, Bob Fitzsimmons, Barney Ross, Kid Chocolate, Benny Lynch, Jimmy Wilde, Pancho Villa, Jimmy Mclarnin, Henry Armstrong, Lou Ambers, Pete Herman, Panama Al Brown, Manuel Ortiz, Harry Greb, Mickey Walker, Gene Tunney, Tommy Loughran. They are all inferior to Nate Campbell, Eddie Chambers, Tomas Adamek, Juan Manuel Marquez, Joan Guzman, Brian Viloria, Roman Gonzalez, Ivan Calderon, Shane Mosley, Manny Pacquiao, Juan Diaz, Hozumi Hasegawa, Fernando Montiel, Anseleno Moreno, Kely Pavlik, Sergio Martinez, Chad Dawson, Antonio Tarver.
Poor quality film of Walker-Hudkins that I slowed down: [DM]xcikne_mickey-walker-boxing_sport[/DM] Walker turns boxer.
thinks for slowing it down, it was pretty hard to catch Walker's boxing movements on the speed that they had it.
Yea thats a fair comparison :-( But I'd still a pick a good few from the second like to beat men in the first list (same weight class)
I know well your not a big fan of pac PP,I was referring to your posts in general,when you have a 'favourite'. And the fact you always find a way to downgrade guys who are either 'old timers' or not your cup of tea. Anyways,no problems,its only a chat room.