Whos is better? Ottkes 21 defences or Hopkins 20 defences?

:rofl:rofl

 

HEADBANGER you loser why you care so much about peoples v cash are you 11 years old. you havent even made any bets what you talking about.

 

21 > 20

 

this brear got slaughted today. Even HEADBANGER and timeout know that.

 

ottke had a great run but the controversies and corruption involved will tarnish his career for ever. calzaghe, ottke and hopkins all had really long suspect runs only joe and bernard had more in them afterwards to move on up

 

Bailey, you are a ****ing hypocrit and has been exposed as a trolling ***! You say that you're not trying to say one is better but your post I've quoted states other wise! You have to nitpick through Hopkins resume to try to make a valid point in which you fail at miserablely. You have the audacity to say that you're not bias...***** PLEASE!:rofl:rofl

 

anyone who says ottke should be removed from the gene pool

 

What is HEADBANGER's opinion on his boy baileys V-Cash

At least he places bets.

 

LMFAO,:rofl

****, I didnt even notice it! He cant use that say **** now, his butt buddy in crime has took a blow on the V-cash.

 

whats your obsession with me recently soldier? :think

 

WOW Ottke and impressive in the same post.....:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

No bet, no guts, no value...:hi:

 

WTF are you talking about? And why are you even quoteing me? I said Ottke got some dubious decisions, are you going to contest that? I also said BOTH got some soft touches...again, you going to contest that? :huh

 

atsch So full of ****.

 

i'd have more respect for him if he could just admit his biases. he couldn't give an objective analysis of a european fighter to save his life. same as i can't give an objective analysis of roy jones