Whos is better? Ottkes 21 defences or Hopkins 20 defences?

and it's 6 successful defenses: he lost to charles brewer if hopkins lost to taylor

 

Wait you want me to start post about who's better at crusierweight before moving up? Between Haye or a Prime Holyfield? Let me take a wild guess, you think Haye is better? If so then sure i'll post that up and i bet i'll own you like crazy. Better yet i bet many here will bash you like a ******ed poster that should stick to other sports.

 

Keep the lame insults to yourself you ginger ****!:yep

whats to read???? You cant tell me **** about homie!:good

You keep on saying pwned but PLEASE go back and show us on how you owned me!

 

1)partially ****ing with you
2)do you think the brewer fight could/should have gone the other way?

 

Headgiver without any question...Bailey isnt that far behind!

 

Herbzig! c'mon, headbanger and bailey do a lot to rile people up. Herbzig BELIEVES this ****...he is just ****ing clueless. I feel more pity for him than anger

 

i gave you an answer if you want to go back and quote it dufus nut:nut

 

once again you have produced irrefutable scientific facts to pwn an entire thread in ferocious fashion

 

Tell me who you think is better? Honestly no bull****. If you do that i'll post it.

 

Trolls get high on thread pages, just like crackheads get high on crack and Calzaghe gets high on coke.

:bananamaniac

HEADBANGER tell your boy bailey to lay off the boxrec man.

 

What does Hop’s debut have to do with anything? It actually proves my point and he lost that fight because he was undisciplined. Soon thereafter he became a gym rat. Btw those little laughing faces do not strengthen any part of your arguments in this thread.


So tell me......their are two trains of thought in boxing on the topic of natural weight, can you explain them to me? How about just one?