who's more exciting to watch manny pacquaio or miguel cotto?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Relentless, Jan 2, 2008.


  1. the_truth

    the_truth Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,042
    0
    Oct 15, 2005
    ill go with cotto... he has shown how to survive when hurt and is more versatile... manny in the other hand is exciting to watch as well, would love to see him go at it with juan diaz... but idk how manny would react if he ever gets hurt, i seen a footage when manny was drop early in his career and just gaved up...
     
  2. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    Manny seems like a faster version of Cotto with a bigger punch and more explosive. He also fights with more emotion which in turn brings out more emotion from fans, take for example when he got cut against Solis, its like waking up a monster. When he gets hurt he turns into a mad man punching back with no regards for his chin and usually the opponent backs out and opts to box instead.
     
  3. Still~style

    Still~style Active Member Full Member

    930
    0
    Sep 4, 2007
  4. KobeIsGod

    KobeIsGod Who Necks?!? Full Member

    7,318
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    pacman by a mile ******* :lol:
     
  5. scott is cool

    scott is cool Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,866
    0
    Dec 1, 2007
    Everytime I have stayed up til 4 am to watch Pacquiao it has been a boring fight. Everytime I've stayed up to watch Cotto, he always sends me back to bed, having watched a brilliant fight! So Cotto, definately.
     
  6. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    yes he was very exciting in his last fight, right jason?
     
  7. iceman

    iceman Tis my Island Full Member

    4,899
    0
    Jul 4, 2006
    these two along with Pavlik are the best to watch
    Pac by a whisker
     
  8. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    :rofl

    Relent-ass?
     
  9. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    If I had to pick one or the other I'd probably choose Cotto because he has a big punch but he has skills as well. More of a style preference rather than more exciting.
     
  10. grabbaman

    grabbaman Member Full Member

    158
    0
    Dec 17, 2007
    pac is more exciting to watch because he fights all 12 rounds like the 1st round, cotto on the other hand has shown a tendency to back off in the later rounds when he is ahead on points. Also, the way they knock opponents out pac does it in a more dramatic fashion.
     
  11. angelos

    angelos Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,623
    1
    Dec 8, 2007
    No Contest. The Pacman.
     
  12. KobeIsGod

    KobeIsGod Who Necks?!? Full Member

    7,318
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    well both guys had fights end in decisions although barrera was a little reluctant to trade. and for good reason. cotto's great though

    who's jason? :lol:
     
  13. Boxer-puncher

    Boxer-puncher Active Member Full Member

    808
    1
    Dec 26, 2007
    Pacman is much more exciting.
     
  14. Marc

    Marc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,971
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    Overall I go for Pac.

    But...

    Pac's excitement meter as of late is dipping... Mab rematch, and the Solis, Larios fights letdowns. Lately Cotto has been picking it up. Mosley/Cotto was quite exciting and the Judah fight was bangin.
     
  15. the_what

    the_what Bolo Punch KO Full Member

    8,031
    0
    Jul 20, 2004
    Cotto has been making the better fights recently. He is more exciting mainly because you have no idea if he is going to win or not.