Who's resume is better per weight divison between DLH-PBF?

the julio cesar chavez Oscar beat at 140 would have taken out The hatton floyd destroyed

 

No it wouldn't be. Oscar has 5 loses he fought better opposition but the key is he lost period. PBF lost few rounds was never dropped or really hurt in a fight won 5 titles in 5 weights and was linear in 3 not to mention he's a better overall boxer than Oscar is. His ATG ranking will be better than Oscars easily he's a top 30 ATG Oscar maybe top 75. I don't count Oscar as being a superstar out of the ring as part of the equation when defining ATG status like some do, if that's the case Oscar would be top 5 ATG.

 

Chavez was a shell of him former self that had been in too many wars. A prime Chavez would have beaten Hatton for sure but not the one that fought Oscar. Also Hatton beat Zoo who beat Chavez so what does that mean?

 

SO I guess Duran, Leonard, Hearns, Whitaker, Jones, Hagler, DLH, etc... all can't be placed ahead of PBF ATG because the also lost to GREAT fighters:nut

 

tszyu was in his prime when he beat chavez, he was no where close to it against hatton

 

Neither of those guys have done anything signifigant to seperate themselves from Ruelas as greatly as you suggest. You're just in DEFEND Mayweateher mode..

 

Stop embarrasing yourself with this lack of boxing knowledge.

With all due respect to Chico, Ruelas-Corrales would have been a pick-em fight!:deal

 

DLH has never beat anyone who's beat him.

Duran and Leonard did. Jones did. Hagler retired after the contro loss which I felt he won.

Hearns got the draw vs Leonard but should of won.

Whitaker was too late in his career to really comeback from it.

 

This content is protected

atsch


My point was, which I'm sure you knew, that FLoyd's lack of Great fighters on his resume explains his undefeated record!:deal

 

0-2 ASSOL:yep

His best shot was the first time, which he clearly lost.

 

No but you missed my point.

 

Should be a NC.

 

You know it should be a NC.