Who's resume is better per weight divison between DLH-PBF?

No he's not. And Corrales was at 130.

 

Please. WHo did Rueles ever beat?? And old Jorge Paez??? Old Freddie Pendleton???

Corrales and Castillo are two steps above Rueles.

 

PBF's career is better 39-0 vs 39-5, 3 linear championships vs 2, 3 years P4P #1 vs 1 year at best.:deal

PBF is the better boxer overall let's take a closer look.
Speed PBF
Chin Even
Stamina PBF
Defense PBF
Footwork PBF
Power Oscar
Ring Generalship PBF
Counter punching PBF
Heart even

PBF is the best fighter of his era period. If he's not then name him?:deal

PBF beat Oscar at 154 on his terms at his first fight in a weight he had no business at. Oscar had every advantage in the book and still couldn't win. PBF way past his best weight is equal to Oscar not being in his prime.

I'm glad I could educate you as to why PBF is clearly the higher ATG.:hi: :good

 

:good

 

LOL Pimp C your use of smileys is very bigtime9.

 

He thinks ending with this guy :hi: means something. All it means is he has the mental capacity of a child. Dumb child...

 

**** off lance:hi:

 

:rofl

 

Oscar fans are going at this debate all wrong focus on the fights oscar OFFICIALLY won instead of decisions you think he should have gotten, for instance Oscar wins at 147 over Pernell,Quartey,Oba Carr smash Floyds 147 resume. Like I said focus on his OFFICIAL wins not the ones he should have gotten.

 

Marciano's career is better at 49-0 vs. Muhammad Ali at 56-5. Marciano would never have lost to the fighters Ali fought. Ali had 5 losses, that automatically makes Marciano better!!!

As for naming a better fighter of this era, Hopkins, Roy Jones, De La Hoya, Lennox Lewis, Holyfield, Trinidad and even Toney come to mind.

If Mayweather had fought guys of the caliber that Trinidad or (DLH) did, he wouldn't be undefeated, that's not speculation either. Trinidad's losses were to three bigger men (Hopkins, Winky and RJJ), two of whom were considered p4p #1 (Hopkins and RJJ) for the better part of the last 10 years.

Had Mayweather actually fought guys of that Caliber in their prime, even with LOSSES, he would be viewed as a greater fighter by many

What advantage did DLH have? Being 4 years older? Having the hunger gone since he was already a part-time fighter and multi-millionaire? Already losing to Mosley (twice), Trinidad, Hopkins, and his grueling fights with Sturm, Quartey, Vargas, etc....?


You make it sound like DLH was in his prime or something, when it was quite the opposite. You probably give a lot credit to PBF for beating Gatti, yet forget to remember that Robinson, Manfredy, and DLH beat hiss down way before PBF ever did, not to mention the wars with Ward.

 

i love these naaive points of view.

sorry..i'll let someone else pull you down..

 

It's called sarcasm in reference to this quote by Douche C

Kinda slow there Bueller....

 

I agree with u on your picks, and yes Corrales was 135 fighter, but he came down to 130 to fight Mayweather.

 

Both of them came down from 130. Mayweather fought his last bout at 130 before Corrales. Corrales was going to move up to lightweight, vacating a belt, but didn't leave 130 for good until 2004.