Who's the best striker in MMA history?

Discussion in 'MMA Forum' started by scurlaruntings, Apr 25, 2009.


  1. boxingcar

    boxingcar Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,525
    1
    Oct 5, 2005
    in mma , prime crocop.

    in both K1 & mma , semmy schilt.

    best striker in ufc history is probably anderson silva though. & certainly not liddell. (way too one dimensional with his striking even though he had the ko power & the right timing)
     
  2. Nuke

    Nuke Full Length Member Full Member

    4,860
    0
    Feb 22, 2005

    Can't argue with that!:good
     
  3. ufoalf

    ufoalf Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,880
    1
    Jan 18, 2007

    Effectiveness > technique, completeness and other opinion based bull****.
    LIddell was as effective in his prime as Anderson right now.
     
  4. boxingcar

    boxingcar Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,525
    1
    Oct 5, 2005
    it almost sounds as if you took it personally. Are a huge liddell fan or what ?

    Anyway , i totally agree with effectiveness > anything (as long as it's working...sure).

    But there's a good reason why i'm not putting liddell in the best striker in mma history category nor even in ufc's history.

    Liddell's career = the art of matchmaking. (thanks to his best friend , dana white...)

    and i'm not insinuating that chuck fought cans all his life. it's not even about that. He finished some big names , (the likes of Ortiz , Couture , Sobral , Horn , Overeem)...

    The problem is that he was mostly confronted against fighters who weren't strikers & better yet...fighters who were even scared of his loopy haymakers.

    & it's no wonder jackson beat him twice. The first one certainly wasn't a fluke. (the one in pride fc).

    You're right though , as long as it's effective...why not.

    but hey , anderson's striking is effective too isn't it ? and if we're comparing the approach of both fighters , one is more complete than the other. (and i'm just talking in the striking department not the rest )...

    that's why i'm personally ranking anderson as ufc's best striker (so far)...

    but in the entire sport... the most impressive ones i've seen are def (prime) crocop , schilt & i almost forgot...manhoef.

    obviously mma is more than just striking , that's why the likes of sakurai , gsp , fedor , hansen , Penn (to name a few)...will generally always have an advantage even when they're confronted to superior strikers...
     
  5. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    Look at the amount of wrestlers the guy fought. Liddell could crack but it wasnt by coincidence. And theres no way Liddell was ever as cerebral as Anderson. Anderson has a huge repertoire of strikes. Liddell was effective with the one dimension he had.
     
  6. rusty nails

    rusty nails Tszyu for PM!! Full Member

    6,300
    10
    Jun 20, 2008
    he might not be the best ever but vitor belfort deserves a mention.
     
  7. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    :good

    Liddell
    Cro Cop
    A Silva


    I cant pick one.
     
  8. MaliSlamusrex

    MaliSlamusrex Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,249
    1
    Nov 10, 2008
    Liddell is a durable guy with good take down defense, his Ko's are spectacular, but his stand up is average at best. Even at his peak Liddell at 205 would loose pure stand up to Belfort.
    The only guys with skills in the UFC at the moment are Machida, Shogun and Silva*2, everyone else is good for MMA standards.
     
  9. sugarngold

    sugarngold RIDDUM Full Member

    18,550
    5
    Jun 10, 2007
    Liddell knocked Belfort down on a way to UD.
     
  10. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
  11. MaliSlamusrex

    MaliSlamusrex Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,249
    1
    Nov 10, 2008
    Rampage Ko'd W.Silva and Liddell, but that doesn't make him a better striker than either.

     
  12. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    striker, is strictly puncher....so that said:

    Cro Cop-78%, but some of those are by kicks and not strikes....

    Chuck 62% KO's....

    Spider Silva 58%....

    I ahve to go with Chuck
     
  13. sugarngold

    sugarngold RIDDUM Full Member

    18,550
    5
    Jun 10, 2007
    True - but I was replying to your comment that "Even at his peak Liddell at 205 would loose pure stand up to Belfort." The fact is that they did fight during their primes and Belfort lost. It bummed me out when it happened because I was always a Belfort fan.
     
  14. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    Iggy has been in a few MMA fights, and err Iggy KO 1 Semmy. :yep

    Now where is the shoe?
     
  15. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    no a striker is someone that strikes his opponent instead of wrestling or submission.