Who's the better fighter prime for prime, Whitaker or Pacquiao?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by CarlesX7, Aug 23, 2009.


  1. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    7,856
    0
    Mar 8, 2008
    :lol::lol::lol:
     
  2. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Pernell Whitaker is better.
     
  3. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    H2H I think Whitaker is prolly the GOAT.

    But people severly overrate his resume, Floyd Mayweather could do everything hes accomplished....there I said it.
     
  4. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
  5. mariancobretti

    mariancobretti Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,802
    0
    May 2, 2009
    Whiteker was exceptional but so is Pacman who has evolved into a complete fighter.

    depends what Pacman does with Cotto, though at the mo..it Sweat Pea.

    I think everyone looks at fighters from other eras with Rose tinted glasses. They were great but not greater than this generations top guys.

    I mean, everyone says ROy Jones was exposed....um....he was 35 he lost his 1st fight and was the 1st person in history to fight in 1 division and drop 25 lbs to Light heavy!

    I mean Hagler got exposed by a blown up welter in Sug ray then!

    Sugar Ray Leanord got his ass smashed by Terry Norris, he got exposed!

    cut this generation some slack
     
  6. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    Good post, mate.
     
  7. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    THX for the FREE!! post..
    BTW, Pea.
     
  8. VX.Nefarious

    VX.Nefarious Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,871
    2
    Aug 14, 2009
    :good
     
  9. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    4
    Jul 12, 2009
    I think Manny Pacquiao should be an option for every poll, regardless of whether he has anything to do with it or not.
     
  10. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    well said. some are just too attached to the past here. of course, they think that 1980's or 70's nba champs can never be defeated by the spurs or lakers of recent years.

    just like fighters from the past who have been mythical in terms of fans appreciation.
     
  11. Maelstrom

    Maelstrom Guest

    You're quick to diss the past fighters because they arent many Pinoys/asians in the HOF:deal

    You're easier to read than Dr Seuss.


    You should watch some fights.
     
  12. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    Pacquiao was never KD in his prime
     
  13. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    oh fuick. let me see, maelstrom. :roll:
    me, see some fights.

    i have watched gerry cooney, larry holmes, srl, tyson, donnie lalonde, terry norris, razor rudock, berbick, douglas.

    oh sure, larry holmes being a fighter from the past can never be defeated bythe likes of vitali, lenox or wlad.

    ****ing idiot. go hang yourself.
     
  14. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    Racist!
     
  15. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    you have always avoided this question.

    why do you hate *****? are you radabs ***** hating little brother. :lol::D


    ***.