Who's the better fighter prime for prime, Whitaker or Pacquiao?

Pernell Whitaker is better.

 

H2H I think Whitaker is prolly the GOAT.

But people severly overrate his resume, Floyd Mayweather could do everything hes accomplished....there I said it.

 

Pac by KO

 

Whiteker was exceptional but so is Pacman who has evolved into a complete fighter.

depends what Pacman does with Cotto, though at the mo..it Sweat Pea.

I think everyone looks at fighters from other eras with Rose tinted glasses. They were great but not greater than this generations top guys.

I mean, everyone says ROy Jones was exposed....um....he was 35 he lost his 1st fight and was the 1st person in history to fight in 1 division and drop 25 lbs to Light heavy!

I mean Hagler got exposed by a blown up welter in Sug ray then!

Sugar Ray Leanord got his ass smashed by Terry Norris, he got exposed!

cut this generation some slack

 

THX for the FREE!! post..
BTW, Pea.

 

:good

 

I think Manny Pacquiao should be an option for every poll, regardless of whether he has anything to do with it or not.

 

well said. some are just too attached to the past here. of course, they think that 1980's or 70's nba champs can never be defeated by the spurs or lakers of recent years.

just like fighters from the past who have been mythical in terms of fans appreciation.

 

You're quick to diss the past fighters because they arent many Pinoys/asians in the HOF:deal

You're easier to read than Dr Seuss.


You should watch some fights.

 

Pacquiao was never KD in his prime

 

oh fuick. let me see, maelstrom. :roll:
me, see some fights.

i have watched gerry cooney, larry holmes, srl, tyson, donnie lalonde, terry norris, razor rudock, berbick, douglas.

oh sure, larry holmes being a fighter from the past can never be defeated bythe likes of vitali, lenox or wlad.

****ing idiot. go hang yourself.

 

Racist!

 

you have always avoided this question.

why do you hate *****? are you radabs ***** hating little brother.


***.