Who's the better heavy...Peter or Haye?

Well obviously Peter is mor eaccomplished and experienced and Haye has only 2 fights at heavy but I think the englishman will be a better HW.

 

Some of you guys act like Bonin and Barrett were complete bums. But acctually they were highly ranked top level fighters by the ABC organizations. Those were big wins that proved Haye at Heavyweight.

Barrett was coming off wins over Cliff Couser and Tye Fields, and Bonin only lost one fight to Audley Harrison.

 

:rofl Well thats start off by saying, Peter is no bum. He has wins over Toney twice, and Maskaev. As well as last man to truly give Wlad a tough fight in the ring, and hurt and floor him several times. I admit Peter has not been at the top of his game lately, but he still has power and and the chin to fight almost any top 10 oppenent and at least be competitive or in some cases win.

 

the ability to KO haye

 

Man, you hate too much.

 

Watch carefully,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjL3m9T755w

competitive you say....atsch

 

In my post I said almost any top 10 Heavyweight, Vitali is the toughest and probably the hardest to beat, as far as Heavyweights go. His younger brother in comparison had a ton of trouble with Peter, at times looked down right petrified of getting hit. Vitali has proven time and time again how much tougher than he is of younger brother Wlad.

 

I agree 100% with this post.

 

Seriously man, are you really this ******ed?

Bonin and Barrett ARE garbage. Highly ranked by who?? The WBF, the IBU or some other organization run out of someones cellar? If you claim those as big wins, then Haye is an utter and complete joke.

Monte Barrett, the same Barrett that got utterly beat down by Klitschko 9 years ago. Hell even Valuev managed to club his ass down. Oh and you forget to mention how Cliff Couser KTFO him.

As for Bonin, this guy has a padded record fighting Polacks in his home country. Losing to Fraudley Harrison pretty much assures your all-time status as "crap"

I understand you like Haye man, but really you're one of the most deluded and ridiculous posters on ESB.

As for the topic, Peter is more proven at HW but seriously declined. Haye has better proven skills at CW, he hasn't proven **** at HW though. He needs to schedule a fight soon against a TOP 10 HW. No more boasting, no more stunts, no more taking months and months to negotiate a contract....get in the ring and prove your skills man!

 

That's right, and you can't get Haye's wood out of your rear. And speaking of brains weren't you the one that got lambasted for creating plethora of threads on virtually the same topic recently....nut:nut

 

Yeah, Bonin was ranked #11 by the WBC. Barrett was WBO #6. I was right.

 

all of Peter's problems started when he became involved with Don King and Stacy McKinley. I do not think that is a coincidence.

 

And now for Peter,
knock out over blown up cruiser Jeremy Williams, barely beat a blown up light heavy in Toney, knocked Julius long, outboxed by Chambers, knocked grandpa Maskaev. Does he really have only one win against a real top heavy?? WHO Hawkins, Sykes.... Bonin and Monte are as good as any Peter win. At heavy, cruiser, or any other weight, Haye is much better than Peter. Maybe not more proven, but the question is, Who's the better heavy, Haye without a doubt.

 

well said rico

 

**** yes, straight HAYEter, fool. but its not like i'm making this **** up :scaredas:

Peter stomps haye. Peter sucks. nothing but truth.