Who's the better scalp? Cotto or Bradley?

It's funny how Bradley is this young undefeated lion now when you Pacquiao ****** mother****ers practically called him a coward for not fighting Khan. Hilarious!

 

manny destryoed cotto when manny was in his prime, floyd will pick apart cotto.

Bradley is not as talented as cotto but is in his prime.

they are both about even except Bradley has more to prove and will be hungry

 

they are about the same you ask me. What weight is Pac/Bradley?

 

Read it again. Hilarious!

 

Why do you have to be biased and call Bradley a baby?

 

atsch

Just compare the opposition so far.

Cry baby Bradley didn't even want it with Khan.

 

Please STOP with this bull****. Bradley was having promotional issues. If that fight had happened, Tim would have sonned A-Mere-Con. Please see the Peterson fight.

 

Tough call, Cotto is past it and damaged. Bradley is very overrated. The best "scalps" would be Floyd fighting Sergio, and Manny fighting JMM, but they both would lose, so.

 

All you've got to remember is that Pacquiao preferred to fight Cotto however refused to move up and fight him at 154 because it would be too tough, so running out of options he's decided to bring little Timmy up in weight instead.

If Bradley was the better scalp and tougher fight then why didn't Pacquiao attempt to fight him in the first place?

:hi:

 

Bradley. Easily.

 

Also it's amazing how much of a boost it's been for Bradley's profile that Khan lost to Peterson.

The guy was banging on about being in an unofficial tournament and then bottled the final.

 

Because money is primary motive for Pac these days. Cotto was always going to be the preferred option. Bradley being second choice still doesn't deter the fact that, at this moment in time, he is the better and more threatening fighter.

And the bringing "little Timmy up in weight" is a weak arguement. They're both the same size. At 147, all it means is that both guys won't have to go through the effort of making weight. Noone will be at a size disadvantage. Criticizing Pac for this is as bad as criticizing Mayweather for bringing Hatton up.

Edit: Fair enough, it was proper lame of Bradley bottling it from Khan and living off Peterson's victory, but, he is/was still the best 140 pounder based on what we've seen so far. I know he ducked the final to prove that for definite, but he is a good, legit opponent.

 

If money was the main motivator then surely they would have fought Marquez?

Also if Cotto was easier than Bradley then why didn't they just move up and fight him so to rake in the big money?

The Hatton comparison is absolutely spot on as I was the one who mentioned it to you the other day btw.

 

Cotto easily. I don't see how anyone can say Bradley.